Vid Request: Texas vs Oklahoma

[Rich]

Originally Posted by griblets

100% agree on the extended forearm.

That's why I'm wondering why nobody else has a PC foul on the travel play. A1 bangs into the torso of B1, who had LGP, and was displaced several feet. If B1 had created that kind of contact on A1, I think we all would agree it's a foul.

Banging into the torso isn't an automatic.

I figure if it's an automatic foul on B, why should A be able to do it?

[griblets]

Originally Posted by Rich

I figure if it's an automatic foul on B, why should A be able to do it?

That's the point I'm making. I'm not saying I would have called it, but I was surprised that nobody was discussing that part of the play.

(Talking about the travel video)

[Rich]

Originally Posted by griblets

That's the point I'm making. I'm not saying I would have called it, but I was surprised that nobody was discussing that part of the play.

(Talking about the travel video)

Nothing in that video is an automatic.

And I agree with some others here. One video per thread is what's going to be considered best practices going forward.

Edited to say: This has revealed a schism between the moderators, so we'll be discussing it further. In the meantime, please clearly mention which play you're talking about.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Rich

Edited to say: This has revealed a schism between the moderators, so we'll be discussing it further. In the meantime, please clearly mention which play you're talking about.

If members get a vote, I vote for one video per thread.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

If members get a vote, I vote for one video per thread.

What do you do if people ask for several plays in one thread? Part of this is member driven.

Peace

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

What do you do if people ask for several plays in one thread? Part of this is member driven.

Peace

Well, for one, I think that too many are asked for in a "I didn't get a look at that and I'd just like to see it again" mode, and not in a "what can I learn from that" mode. So, I'd probably not put so many up. I do recognize that I'm probably in the minority on this.

Second, the responder can create separate threads and respond to the OP that they are posted (or not) and the original thread can be deleted (or will go away). Or, one thread for all requests and separate threads for each video.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Well, for one, I think that too many are asked for in a "I didn't get a look at that and I'd just like to see it again" mode, and not in a "what can I learn from that" mode. So, I'd probably not put so many up. I do recognize that I'm probably in the minority on this.

Second, the responder can create separate threads and respond to the OP that they are posted (or not) and the original thread can be deleted (or will go away). Or, one thread for all requests and separate threads for each video.

Well in this particular thread people asked about 2 plays in this game\. I posted them to keep things streamlined on some level. I thought we always did it that way. It might get confusing if we discuss the same game in different threads. But I will do what the moderators want me to do when I post up. I do not think there is a stated policy either way. It really makes little difference to me. I just know that when someone says something similar the moderators combine the threads.

I think problem is mostly solved if people just reference the play in question, but I can see the confusion.

If the moderators have some insight, I will do what they wish.

It really makes little difference to me in the long run.

Peace