Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official
Maybe one of these days you'll realize that the only reason this thread got off topic was because you made a erroneous blanket statement and were correctly called out for it.
Either you haven't read what I've posted that addresses this, or you just don't want to admit that the rule supports my position and the case play.
|
There is nothing to admit. The case play (not originally posted) posted has nothing to do with a throw-in. We were talking about a throw-in. My comment unilaterally applies to all BC violations. You have to have PC in order to have TC to then have TC in the FC. If you do not have TC in the FC, all taps and touches does not give you FC status on a throw-in until you have PC at some point and then TC in the BC.
Nothing to admit when that is the rule across the board.
Peace
Sun Nov 08, 2015, 01:18pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
