2015-16 The Most Misunderstood Basketball Rules ...

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

It is not an erroneous statement. You need PC before you have TC, that is the rule as listed.

There is a reason you are on this island with your friend alone.

Peace

Just to refresh your selective memory, this is what you posted.

And that casebook play you mentioned does not go along with the written rule. When all else fails, I am going with the rulebook and what it states.

Peace

This statement is not correct. And more than just OKREF and I disagreed with you on this thread. I am not "on this island." In fact, I would argue that you are on an island trying to say that the case play isn't right. Nice try.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Just to refresh your selective memory, this is what you posted.



This statement is not correct. And more than just OKREF and I disagreed with you on this thread. I am not "on this island." In fact, I would argue that you are on an island trying to say that the case play isn't right. Nice try.

Even OKREF backed off of his statements when he realized he was arguing something that was not at issue. And he changed or edited his post from what he originally said. But you did not see that either (he admitted to this).

You continue to keep up the good fight.

Peace

[SC Official]

Good for him. Maybe you should follow his lead and admit that you were wrong.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Good for him. Maybe you should follow his lead and admit that you were wrong.

I wasn't wrong. He did not understand the conversation. I was responding to that misunderstanding (he changed the play once again).

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I wasn't wrong. He did not understand the conversation. I was responding to that misunderstanding (he changed the play once again).

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

You do no wrong ever on this forum.

If you really don't care, stop responding.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

You do no wrong ever on this forum.

If you really don't care, stop responding.

I think what I do on this forum is the last of my concern.

I respond because I can.

Keep up the good fight.

Peace

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Good for him. Maybe you should follow his lead and admit that you were wrong.

The case play cited had nothing to with Geof's confusion about a BC violation subsequent to a throw-in. Have you acknowledge that yet?

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

The case play cited had nothing to with Geof's confusion about a BC violation subsequent to a throw-in. Have you acknowledge that yet?

Correct. It has everything to do with Rut's blanket statement. And we are still here because Rut said that case play "did not go with the rules," and I responded. If it had nothing to do with Geof's confusion, then he never should have posted an erroneous opinion to further add to the confusion.

It's not that complicated.

Good day.

[JRutledge]

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Correct. It has everything to do with Rut's blanket statement. And we are still here because Rut said that case play "did not go with the rules," and I responded. If it had nothing to do with Geof's confusion, then he never should have posted an erroneous opinion to further add to the confusion.

It's not that complicated.

Good day.

Did you ever assist Geof in pointing out not to use the case play cited as a basis to rule on the play he was questioning?

Did you ever point out, for the benefit of newer officials, what the proper scenarios would be for adjudicating the BC rule per the case play cited by OKREF?

If I were just to follow your posts on the subject, I would not learn anything about the practical applications of the BC rule. At least with Jeff, I would know throw-in situations are not covered by that case play.

[Scrapper1]

Holy crap, I forgot how much I loved this forum. LOL!!!

Where's Mark Dexter with the popcorn gif??

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Did you ever assist Geof in pointing out not to use the case play cited as a basis to rule on the play he was questioning?

Did you ever point out, for the benefit of newer officials, what the proper scenarios would be for adjudicating the BC rule per the case play cited by OKREF?

If I were just to follow your posts on the subject, I would not learn anything about the practical applications of the BC rule. At least with Jeff, I would know throw-in situations are not covered by that case play.

I don't even know what this is supposed to mean. Did you do any of these things either?