2015-16 The Most Misunderstood Basketball Rules ...

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by OKREF

These kinds of responses are why I will never, ever have any kind of respect for you. I just said I miss read what you typed and you come across like you do.

Then do not have respect for me. You and the other guys insisting on picking a nit like this, is the reason I really do not care much for what you would say anyway. You did not read the conversation and tried to hold on to what was "wrong" about the conversation. You also did not read the other comments by others that said the same thing but some strange reason only picked on my comments.

You will get over it. If you don't, not my problem.

Peace

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Then do not have respect for me. You and the other guys insisting on picking a nit like this, is the reason I really do not care much for what you would say anyway. You did not read the conversation and tried to hold on to what was "wrong" about the conversation. You also did not read the other comments by others that said the same thing but some strange reason only picked on my comments.

You will get over it. If you don't, not my problem.

Peace

Rut, you flat out said that the case play that OKREF posted was wrong, even though the rules support it. It has nothing to do with the "throw-in." You said it was wrong, and then got defensive.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Rut, you flat out said that the case play that OKREF posted was wrong, even though the rules support it. It has nothing to do with the "throw-in." You said it was wrong, and then got defensive.

OK, if you say so. Again you did not read the situation and started talking about it without knowing the context. That is what Cameron was saying. It is also obvious that you did not know he edited his post and reference either.

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

OK, if you say so. Again you did not read the situation and started talking about it without knowing the context. That is what Cameron was saying. It is also obvious that you did not know he edited his post and reference either.

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

And it is clear that you refuse to take any blame for posting a blanket statement and an erroneous opinion about a case play.

Good day to you.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

And it is clear that you refuse to take any blame for posting a blanket statement and an erroneous opinion about a case play.

Good day to you.

It is not an erroneous statement. You need PC before you have TC, that is the rule as listed.

There is a reason you are on this island with your friend alone.

Peace

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

It is not an erroneous statement. You need PC before you have TC, that is the rule as listed.

There is a reason you are on this island with your friend alone.

Peace

Just to refresh your selective memory, this is what you posted.

And that casebook play you mentioned does not go along with the written rule. When all else fails, I am going with the rulebook and what it states.

Peace

This statement is not correct. And more than just OKREF and I disagreed with you on this thread. I am not "on this island." In fact, I would argue that you are on an island trying to say that the case play isn't right. Nice try.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Just to refresh your selective memory, this is what you posted.



This statement is not correct. And more than just OKREF and I disagreed with you on this thread. I am not "on this island." In fact, I would argue that you are on an island trying to say that the case play isn't right. Nice try.

Even OKREF backed off of his statements when he realized he was arguing something that was not at issue. And he changed or edited his post from what he originally said. But you did not see that either (he admitted to this).

You continue to keep up the good fight.

Peace