subs in?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I think it's been in the book for 20 years at least.

It has not been that long as I had a conversation about this when I did not grant a timeout and a veteran told me about the casebook. This conversation took place in the 90s and did not change for some time as it was still in the book.

Peace

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

It has not been that long as I had a conversation about this when I did not grant a timeout and a veteran told me about the casebook. This conversation took place in the 90s and did not change for some time as it was still in the book.

Peace

If somebody asks for a TO and you blow whistle, rule obligates you to give it/enforce it...even if they didnt have ball, control etc. Even if you shouldnt have blown the whistle for them.
If they didnt ask for a TO but you thought they did then you put ball in play at POI.

This has been the rule for a long time.

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I think it's been in the book for 20 years at least.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

It has not been that long as I had a conversation about this when I did not grant a timeout and a veteran told me about the casebook. This conversation took place in the 90s and did not change for some time as it was still in the book.

Ummm. Half of the 90s were at least 20 years ago.

Getting old stinks, doesn't it? What seems like 5 years ago turns out to be 20.