The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 20, 2012, 11:36am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits View Post
Wording of FED rule 6-2-4f regarding infractions that result in a balk:

"...failing to pitch to the batter when the entire non-pivot foot passes behind the perpendicular plane of the back edge of the pitcher's plate, except when feinting or throwing to second base in attempt to put out a runner."

If the pitcher's foot landed "on the backside of the rubber" as described in the OP, then it did pass behind the "perpendicular plane of the back edge of the pitcher's plate". Remember your geometry: planes extend indefinitely, and the "perpendicular plane of the back edge of the pitcher's plate" would not be limited to just the 24" width of the pitcher's plate.

Having said all that, I doubt I would have been able to see enough to call a balk from either behind the plate or from the B position.
It would be pretty hard for that entire foot to come behind the rubber on the step to first base. Couldn't imagine I'd even be looking to pick that nit.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 20, 2012, 11:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by GROUPthink View Post
Couldn't imagine I'd even be looking to pick that nit.
Agreed.
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 20, 2012, 06:18pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by GROUPthink View Post
It would be pretty hard for that entire foot to come behind the rubber on the step to first base. Couldn't imagine I'd even be looking to pick that nit.
Impractical, but not impossible.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 89
Sorry for the numbering guys. I choose the firing squad over being stoned please

In regards to my partners explanation on how he called the balk, he stated that he looked at where the foot landed and that in his judgement it landed behind the rubber. Now I had a similar play that I posted on here that involved a right handed pitcher going to third, however his free foot in my judgement crossed behind the rubber before picking to 3rd. In the most recent case where my partner called the balk, he said that his foot did not cross behind before the pick off, but in his judgement that it landed behind the rubber after the pickoff.

Hope all that makes since.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 20, 2012, 10:08pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by tankmjg24 View Post
Sorry for the numbering guys. I choose the firing squad over being stoned please
Sure you weren't already stoned when you wrote it?
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Balk Question LDUB Baseball 7 Fri Aug 12, 2011 01:43pm
Balk Question? sprivitor Baseball 8 Thu Dec 30, 2010 09:17pm
Another Balk Question tayjaid Baseball 3 Sat May 08, 2010 05:10pm
To Balk Or Not To Balk, That Is The Question.. chuckfan1 Baseball 21 Wed Sep 03, 2003 03:21pm
Balk Question CDcoach Baseball 11 Fri May 23, 2003 05:16pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1