![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Simply give a safe signal if the BR did indeed beat the throw, "aquiring" the base. It now becomes an appeal play and it's up to the defense to recognize that an proper appeal must be made. Then you would make your ruling.
__________________
Its' not a matter of being right or wrong, it's a matter of working hard to get it right. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm still looking for NFHS documentation as I am in a discussion with a few HS baseball umpires who insist that an (immediate out call is the correct mechanic. My word carries no weight. ;-) |
|
|||
|
Quote:
If you fail to signal that the runner beat the ball, you will signal the defense that the runner missed the base. Thus the proper mechanic is to signal "safe" and rule on any properly constituted subsequent appeal.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hugo, I know that you emailed me about this last week. I searched through all the FED materials I have on hand and all I could come up with is what mbyron posted above from the FED Baseball Umpires Manual...then I forgot to email you back. But I suppose your doubting colleagues might need more than that. If they don't get the basic premise that a runner passing a base is assumed to have aquired it, pending an appeal, then I'm sure they want an interpretation spelled out and wrapped up in a tidy little bow to convince them otherwise. I couldn't find such a reference for FED. The Major League Baseball Umpires Manual spells this out exactly as has been stated- signal the B/R safe, then wait for an appeal. |
|
|||
|
I don't have it with me however, Jaksa/Roder covers this play. You'll need to explain to them the difference between aquiring a base vs. touching a base. Until they understand this concept, they'll never get it.
__________________
Its' not a matter of being right or wrong, it's a matter of working hard to get it right. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have posted this several places and did get the MLB Umpire manual quote which I just emailed to one of them. Of course, the comment was that they were talking about NFHS,,, It appears (so far), from inquiring on several boards, that NFHS does not spell it out word for word, nor have a reference to something like " a player who has reached/passed a base is treated as if they touched the base" Maybe one day they'll get it. ![]() The good thing is - I don't do baseball with them!
|
|
|||
|
Don't grant time. If you did, you kind of screwed up.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
|
Disagree in Fed. What if it's the defense requesting time to execute a dead ball appeal?
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade." |
|
|||
|
Please enlighten us as to how to treat it as such per NFHS? I am not sure what you are trying to say. MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials Ohio High School Athletic Association Toledo, Ohio |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VT Beats US Olympians | emaxos | Softball | 0 | Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:41am |
| New mechanic for backcourt throw-in? | jdccpa | Basketball | 6 | Thu Dec 15, 2005 04:09pm |
| 3 man mechanic on sideline throw in below free throw line extended!!!! | jritchie | Basketball | 10 | Tue Nov 01, 2005 02:43pm |
| Throw in violation...mechanic | Jeff the Ref | Basketball | 11 | Tue Dec 02, 2003 08:51am |
| BR Beats Throw to 1B but misses Base | Phil Vivenzio | Baseball | 9 | Sat Mar 17, 2001 08:59pm |