The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 29, 2011, 10:16pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
The NCAA rule makes sense to me. If theplate is blocked, you can got for the plate, even if that means going "through" the catcher. If the plate isn't b;locked, you can't go after the catcher.
Unless the contact is judged to be above the waist. Then it violates the collision rule. Then it is judged as an attempt to dislodge the baseball, not an attempt to reach the plate.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 31, 2011, 07:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northwest suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 645
Anyone hear Posey's comments about the incident? An ESPN interview has him stating that he doesn't want the rule changed and how collisions are part of professional baseball.

Someone rekindled a thread from 4 years ago regarding INT at 2B. It is interesting to see some say how rule changes will be forthcoming because the players will demand it. Four years later...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 31, 2011, 10:00am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeStrybel View Post
Anyone hear Posey's comments about the incident? An ESPN interview has him stating that he doesn't want the rule changed and how collisions are part of professional baseball.

Someone rekindled a thread from 4 years ago regarding INT at 2B. It is interesting to see some say how rule changes will be forthcoming because the players will demand it. Four years later...
1. It's not up to Posey.
2. He would like like a big baby if he were to come out now and push for a rule change. No way he does that.
3. I anticipate the owners will push for it harder than the players.
4. One incident won't be a catalyst.
5. It'll probably have to happen to a more high profile player before a rule change is made.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 31, 2011, 01:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
1. It's not up to Posey.
2. He would like like a big baby if he were to come out now and push for a rule change. No way he does that.
3. I anticipate the owners will push for it harder than the players.
4. One incident won't be a catalyst.
5. It'll probably have to happen to a more high profile player before a rule change is made.

Posey is quoted in the Bay Area media as asserting that he purposely left a lane open for Cousins and Cousins went out of his way to take him out. There is no quote from Posey justifying the hit or approving of this particular collision that I can find.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 31, 2011, 05:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
It'll probably have to happen to a more high profile player before a rule change is made.
More high-profile:
1. NL Rookie of the Year
2. 5th overall pick (and highest-picked catcher)
3. (At the time) highest draft-signing bonus

I'd say for a kid in his 2nd year of MLB, he's pretty high-profile. Not to mention he was one of the young stars of the game.

What more profile do you need?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 31, 2011, 06:44pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by yawetag View Post
I'd say for a kid in his 2nd year of MLB, he's pretty high-profile. Not to mention he was one of the young stars of the game.

What more profile do you need?
Honestly? If I had to guess, I'd say a veteran who doesn't play on the west coast. Being in the WS helped, but not as much as playing in SF hurts.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 01, 2011, 01:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Honestly? If I had to guess, I'd say a veteran who doesn't play on the west coast. Being in the WS helped, but not as much as playing in SF hurts.
You missed every other point I made. No, he's not Pujols, but he's a rising star with a big contract. I think his profile is good enough to make the argument begin to roll.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 01, 2011, 01:13pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by yawetag View Post
You missed every other point I made. No, he's not Pujols, but he's a rising star with a big contract. I think his profile is good enough to make the argument begin to roll.
No, I didn't miss your points. I simply answered your question.

I didn't say he wasn't high profile, just that it would probably take a higher profile injury. I could be wrong, though.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.

Last edited by Adam; Wed Jun 01, 2011 at 01:16pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 01, 2011, 01:30pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by yawetag View Post
More high-profile:
1. NL Rookie of the Year
2. 5th overall pick (and highest-picked catcher)
3. (At the time) highest draft-signing bonus

I'd say for a kid in his 2nd year of MLB, he's pretty high-profile. Not to mention he was one of the young stars of the game.

What more profile do you need?
And all that is great but he is not a household name like A-Rod or Jeter. This is baseball; there are not many players that everyone knows who they are. So if something happen to the two players I mentioned I would not be surprised that more attention would be mentioned about a rules change. With all that being said, they are not going to change rules in this matter. MLB is likes to act like tradition makes them special.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 31, 2011, 07:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
Unless the contact is judged to be above the waist. Then it violates the collision rule. Then it is judged as an attempt to dislodge the baseball, not an attempt to reach the plate.
that's a guideline, not an absolute. I wasn't trying to recreate the entire rule and interp in my post.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When is hair contact a contact? OmniSpiker Volleyball 6 Tue Nov 04, 2008 06:27pm
First Contact chartrusepengui Volleyball 2 Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:57pm
+ POS---Does anyone have a contact there? jwwashburn Baseball 25 Wed Aug 02, 2006 07:32pm
NFL - down by contact jack015 Football 1 Thu Jan 01, 2004 01:47pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1