Strange obstruction play

[MD Longhorn]

I apologize if that rubbed you the wrong way. Reading it now I can see how it might have seemed like a personal slam. You did, however, make your post as if it was the correct answer to the question without any mention that you don't do Fed but here's the OBR answer.

OBS can be a touchy subject with me as I work with umpires who just won't call it - and when I do coaches think I'm speaking chinese, even though their F3 is standing on the freaking bag 12 times a game as runners try to run around them.

[rbmartin]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

I apologize if that rubbed you the wrong way. Reading it now I can see how it might have seemed like a personal slam. You did, however, make your post as if it was the correct answer to the question without any mention that you don't do Fed but here's the OBR answer.

OBS can be a touchy subject with me as I work with umpires who just won't call it - and when I do coaches think I'm speaking chinese, even though their F3 is standing on the freaking bag 12 times a game as runners try to run around them.

No offense taken.

So is it your assesment that the OP under FED would be ruled obstruction but under OBR would be a HTBT?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by rbmartin

No offense taken.

So is it your assesment that the OP under FED would be ruled obstruction but under OBR would be a HTBT?

yes