The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 23, 2010, 12:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpjong View Post
Sr. Legion baseball, R2 picked off of second. R2 comes in hard standing.
More info needed. Did R2 knock F4/F6 into the "cheap seats" ?

Quote:
BU calls him out and sternly warns the runner that he was very close to malicious contact but leaves it at that.
What is "very close to MC" mean? We either have MC or not. If we do not have MC then the BU should say nothing to the runner. That's like saying "it's close to a balk" and then the BU having a chat with F1 about it.

If R2 knocked F4/F6 into the "cheap seats" and the BU did NOTHING about it then I can see the PU Ejecting R2 to keep control over the game.

In a nutshell IMO more info needed.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 23, 2010, 12:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 251
In my opinion, no malicious contact, but when runner went in there was enough contact that fielder fell over on his butt. 220 pounds vs. 150. No shove, just momentum of runner.

The point was also to determine what reaction you would have if this occurred to you as BU regardless of degree of the contact. You had already judged it and your partner came in and over ruled you on it...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 23, 2010, 12:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 685
After the game:

"Hey (PU), why did you eject #12?"

Then it becomes a conversation based on his answer. Let's say the originator is right and he did eject him for MC.

"You know, (PU), the MC call is mine to make, why did you poach it?"

On the field, you can't overrule your partner on something like this. Nor can you eject someone when he is standing in front of your partner on a play that's not yours.

But after the game, you take care of the problem.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 23, 2010, 01:39pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Big vs. little does not mean malicious contact. Just like little vs. big could mean malicious contact...a player could "lose" and still have MC called on him.

Not implying that you'd necessarily disagree...just saying.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 23, 2010, 01:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
It amazes me how many umpires out there don't understand that the word malicious comes from the word MALICE. Hard contact is not necessarily malicious, in fact --- you can knock someone "into the cheap seats" and not have it be malice (just as you can have a far lesser collision and HAVE MC). Malice implies intent.

First mistake here as mentioned above - there's no such thing as almost malicious. Either there was malice or there was not. There's no warning here.

Second - and worse - mistake. PU should have minded his own business. If this happens to me as BU, I immediately go talk it over with him. I suppose it's possible he saw something I didn't, like a punch attempt I was blocked from... but this isn't likely. This is NOT his call and you already made the call. YOUR call is the one that stands. BU looks like an idiot here, but it was PU who was most likely the idiot.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 23, 2010, 05:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
It amazes me how many umpires out there don't understand that the word malicious comes from the word MALICE. Hard contact is not necessarily malicious, in fact --- you can knock someone "into the cheap seats" and not have it be malice (just as you can have a far lesser collision and HAVE MC). Malice implies intent.

First mistake here as mentioned above - there's no such thing as almost malicious. Either there was malice or there was not. There's no warning here.

Second - and worse - mistake. PU should have minded his own business. If this happens to me as BU, I immediately go talk it over with him. I suppose it's possible he saw something I didn't, like a punch attempt I was blocked from... but this isn't likely. This is NOT his call and you already made the call. YOUR call is the one that stands. BU looks like an idiot here, but it was PU who was most likely the idiot.
+1. That's hitting the nail on the Head on every aspect
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 23, 2010, 05:40pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,557
How do you know that the player was ejected for MC? Did you talk to the guy after the game?

And if I was not his partner, I would not do anything unless I knew that was what the ejection was for. And likely would not have had that conversation until after the game. I have no idea what someone specifically ejects someone for until after the game unless it is obvious. It sounds like some words might have been exchanged and that was what the ejection was actually for. But then again how do we know if you do not talk to the guy personally?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Public address talking during FTs CoachJW Basketball 7 Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:23am
WTH is going on?....did Obama address the coaches privately? CajunNewBlue Softball 9 Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:50am
Officiating.com e-mail address 5050pete Feedback 2 Thu Mar 02, 2006 01:44pm
Do you address this with your partner? Hawks Coach Basketball 9 Thu May 15, 2003 10:18pm
New Email Address Elaine "Lady Blue" Softball 0 Wed Dec 11, 2002 07:39pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1