The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 14, 2010, 10:41pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
yeah...I'm not saying they're never wrong because even they will admit that they're wrong sometimes...heck we're human. i wonder how they ruled this to put the B/R on 1B. must have something to do with ball 4 as stated in an above post.

an illegal pitch w/ runners on is an illegal pitch...but is there something in the interps about it being a 3-2 count and not giving the defense a chance to strike the batter out on a 3-2 count?
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 14, 2010, 11:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 425
Quote:
an illegal pitch w/ runners on is an illegal pitch...but is there something in the interps about it being a 3-2 count and not giving the defense a chance to strike the batter out on a 3-2 count?
an illegal pitch with runners on is a balk. R1 to 2nd, batter back up with a 3-2 count.

No options with a balk.

Sometimes you just have to say "WTF?"
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 14, 2010, 11:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpTTS43 View Post
an illegal pitch with runners on is a balk. R1 to 2nd, batter back up with a 3-2 count.

No options with a balk.

Sometimes you just have to say "WTF?"
I agree. There are 2 things it could be: an illegal pitch (only with no runners on base) or a balk. An illegal pitch with runners on base is a balk, so there is nothing that allows you to credit a ball to the batter. The balk penalty is as I stated it above:

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrm21711

2) The crew did not correctly enforce the balk by awarding the batter a ball and and awarding him first base as a result. The balk penalty is the runners are awarded their advance base and the pitch does not count. Here they gave Votto 2B and Phillips 1B. Crew should have awarded Votto 2B and Phillips should have remained at bat with a 3-2 count.
IMO the crew got this wrong. It HAS to be a balk and not an IP and the balk penalty never lets you award a ball to the batter.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 14, 2010, 11:43pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Sometimes I wonder how 4 guys can get any of the rule interps wrong at that level...it may have something to do w/ Joyce's experience. Is he the crew chief? Maybe the other guys didn't step in since they weren't asked...
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 15, 2010, 12:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
Sometimes I wonder how 4 guys can get any of the rule interps wrong at that level...it may have something to do w/ Joyce's experience. Is he the crew chief? Maybe the other guys didn't step in since they weren't asked...
Cousins was - he is in the video. The crew was Cousins, Joyce, Bill Miller, and AAA Fill In Adrian Johnson.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 15, 2010, 08:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
.......an illegal pitch w/ runners on is an illegal pitch...but is there something in the interps about it being a 3-2 count and not giving the defense a chance to strike the batter out on a 3-2 count?
Maybe OBR 8.05 (e) might be of some value to understand that an illegal pitch with runners on is a balk:
OBR 8.05
(e)
The pitcher makes an illegal pitch;

Rule 8.05(e) Comment: A quick pitch is an illegal pitch. Umpires will judge a quick pitch as one delivered before the batter is reasonably set in the batter’s box. With runners on base the penalty is a balk; with no runners on base, it is a ball. The quick pitch is dangerous and should not be permitted.

Note that the comment specifically states that an illegal pitch with runners on is penalized as a balk.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 15, 2010, 09:32am
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
I know the rule...I guess I was playing along trying to figure out how they could've ruled the way that they did. Thanks for posting it though.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 15, 2010, 11:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
Maybe OBR 8.05 (e) might be of some value to understand that an illegal pitch with runners on is a balk:
OBR 8.05
(e)
The pitcher makes an illegal pitch;

Rule 8.05(e) Comment: A quick pitch is an illegal pitch. Umpires will judge a quick pitch as one delivered before the batter is reasonably set in the batter’s box. With runners on base the penalty is a balk; with no runners on base, it is a ball. The quick pitch is dangerous and should not be permitted.

Note that the comment specifically states that an illegal pitch with runners on is penalized as a balk.
The way I interpret that too is that they are mutually exclusive - you cant have an illegal pitch & balk on the same play and combine penalties like the crew in the video did.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 15, 2010, 01:47pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrm21711 View Post
The way I interpret that too is that they are mutually exclusive - you cant have an illegal pitch & balk on the same play and combine penalties like the crew in the video did.
Interesting point...the penalty for illegal pitch can be a balk...but you can't have both balk AND illegal pitch penalties on the same play?
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 15, 2010, 01:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrm21711 View Post
The way I interpret that too is that they are mutually exclusive - you cant have an illegal pitch & balk on the same play and combine penalties like the crew in the video did.
correct. we catch mlb umpires too often messing up rules... which is odd
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 15, 2010, 02:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 177
I found this balk penalty ruling the Baseball Almanac website:


PENALTY: The ball is dead, and each runner shall advance one base without liability to be put out, unless the batter reaches first on a hit, an error, a base on balls, a hit batter, or otherwise, and all other runners advance at least one base, in which case the play proceeds without reference to the balk.

It says the balk is ignored if the batter reaches on a base on balls.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 15, 2010, 02:56pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by David M View Post
It says the balk is ignored if the batter reaches on a base on balls.
Which didn't happen because the batter flied out to right. If he had taken the pitch and it was called ball four, the balk would've been ignored since the batter made it safely to first and the runner advanced one base.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 17, 2010, 06:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
Which didn't happen because the batter flied out to right. If he had taken the pitch and it was called ball four, the balk would've been ignored since the batter made it safely to first and the runner advanced one base.
HOWEVER, if the runner was on second and the pitch was ball 4, it would have been a balk; count still full.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 17, 2010, 08:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by David M View Post
.

It says the balk is ignored if the batter reaches on a base on balls.
It can't be a ball if the batter swings at it.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 15, 2010, 02:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
I know that Johnson doesn't deserve to take the hit on this one, but he has got to be the worst call-up working.

From his floating strike zone to changing his call on Twins' Mauer getting hbp after Gardehire argued and WITHOUT talking to a single partner, AJ has shown that he is not ready for the big time.

However, rumors persist that he is second or third in order to move up.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Balk/No Balk: LHP fients pickoff the 3rd base Mike6221 Baseball 4 Sun Jun 07, 2009 09:47pm
That's a balk (video) David Emerling Baseball 43 Thu Sep 06, 2007 01:11am
Balk Video Yanxfan Baseball 17 Wed Mar 28, 2007 08:38am
Jim Evans Academy Balk Video MajorDave Baseball 10 Sat Mar 17, 2007 07:18am
RHP in stretch facing 1st base (balk or no balk) tem_blue Baseball 6 Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:00pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1