![]() |
|
|
|||
Balk Video
Myself and some other association members were talking about this specific play during the 2009 MLB season and I managed to find the video.
Baseball Video Highlights & Clips | FLA@CIN: Marlins get out of the jam despite a balk - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia I felt this would be a great video to show our association members during our pitching rule/balk presentation. Here were some points I wanted to stress: 1) Joyce nailed the balk by not killing (if you watch the replay you can see him trying to kill it but the PU Adrian Johnson didnt notice him when he ran up the 1B line to make the call) until the ball was caught by RF and it was apparent the BR would not reach 1B. 2) The crew did not correctly enforce the balk by awarding the batter a ball and and awarding him first base as a result. The balk penalty is the runners are awarded their advance base and the pitch does not count. Here they gave Votto 2B and Phillips 1B. Crew should have awarded Votto 2B and Phillips should have remained at bat with a 3-2 count. 3) With no runners on base, this would be an illegal pitch and a BALL would be awarded to Phillips. If the ball was caught in RF, he would be awarded first because of this. If the ball dropped in RF & Phillips reached first, the illegal pitch would be ignored. I felt this was a good video and could perhaps show our members how to enforce balks under OBR (since most are clueless how balks and penalties are supposed to be enforced under OBR). Any other suggestions or comments regarding my points? Thanks in advance. |
|
|||
WOW... and these guys get 300k a year. Nobody mechanically called the balk. The moment RF caught the ball time should have been called. R1 to second and batter back to bat. Hell, Johnson is a AAA fill-in. He should atleast know the rule himself? BTW, The MLB guys DO NOT have to take a rules test each year. If I screwed this up in a college game, my boss would have my ***.
|
|
|||
It looks to me that they got it right. If you look at the video, at least to me, it seems like Jim Joyce is saying it's not a balk, it's an illegal pitch. It looks like he says it several times in the video. Therefore, with a 3-2 count, the batter is properly awarded a ball for the penalty, in this case also 1B, because of the count, with R1 being sent to 2B.
__________________
Its' not a matter of being right or wrong, it's a matter of working hard to get it right. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
yeah...I'm not saying they're never wrong because even they will admit that they're wrong sometimes...heck we're human. i wonder how they ruled this to put the B/R on 1B. must have something to do with ball 4 as stated in an above post.
an illegal pitch w/ runners on is an illegal pitch...but is there something in the interps about it being a 3-2 count and not giving the defense a chance to strike the batter out on a 3-2 count?
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Quote:
No options with a balk. Sometimes you just have to say "WTF?" |
|
|||
Quote:
Note that the comment specifically states that an illegal pitch with runners on is penalized as a balk.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out! Ozzy |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Balk/No Balk: LHP fients pickoff the 3rd base | Mike6221 | Baseball | 4 | Sun Jun 07, 2009 09:47pm |
That's a balk (video) | David Emerling | Baseball | 43 | Thu Sep 06, 2007 01:11am |
Balk Video | Yanxfan | Baseball | 17 | Wed Mar 28, 2007 08:38am |
Jim Evans Academy Balk Video | MajorDave | Baseball | 10 | Sat Mar 17, 2007 07:18am |
RHP in stretch facing 1st base (balk or no balk) | tem_blue | Baseball | 6 | Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:00pm |