The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 10, 2009, 04:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The 503
Posts: 785
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveshane67 View Post
Im not a baseball ump, but used to play, and I can strongly say I feel you were 100% out of line. So what if the batter wrongly thinks he can take as much time as he wants. Give he as must time as granted in the rule book, then assess the penalty as prescribed in the rule book. I dont know the rules but Im willing to bet a substantial amount of $$ that the penalty for voicing an opinion on a rule that is wrong is not an objectionable offense.

Obviously the guy thought your strike call was too generous, but so what, are you gonna toss every pitcher that doesnt get a borderline pitch and walks off the mound and mutters something (a la carlos zambrano)
As usual, it's not IF the rat objects, it's how he goes about it. Here, he chose...poorly. And you know very well muttering something is not what got him ejected.

I can strongly say I feel the umpire did just fine. But I've been umpiring longer than I ever played.

"Draw a line up there..." I'm still chuckling.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 10, 2009, 04:32pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveshane67 View Post
Im not a baseball ump, but used to play, and I can strongly say I feel you were 100% out of line. So what if the batter wrongly thinks he can take as much time as he wants. Give he as must time as granted in the rule book, then assess the penalty as prescribed in the rule book. I dont know the rules but Im willing to bet a substantial amount of $$ that the penalty for voicing an opinion on a rule that is wrong is not an objectionable offense.

Obviously the guy thought your strike call was too generous, but so what, are you gonna toss every pitcher that doesnt get a borderline pitch and walks off the mound and mutters something (a la carlos zambrano)
I was going to say something here, but I read Matt's post, which covered just about everything I was going to cover.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 10, 2009, 09:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
You lose. 9.01(d).
No, You Lose

Quote:
Each umpire has authority to disqualify any player, coach, manager or substitute for objecting to decisions or for unsportsmanlike conduct or language, and to eject such disqualified person from the playing field. If an umpire disqualifies a player while a play is in progress, the disqualification shall not take effect until no further action is possible in that play.
The ump ejected the batter after he wrongly asserted that he has as much time as he wants. to my knowledge, it is not an ejectionable offense to misunderstand the rules, or else there be no one playing ball!!!

and besides, in any given baseball game there are about 30 objections to decisions, I think you need to reconsider the umps role in the game. The umps shouldnt be going out of their way to "take the bat out of the players hand", let the players play.

Last edited by steveshane67; Fri Jul 10, 2009 at 09:11pm. Reason: typos
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 10, 2009, 09:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by SethPDX View Post
As usual, it's not IF the rat objects, it's how he goes about it. Here, he chose...poorly. And you know very well muttering something is not what got him ejected.

I can strongly say I feel the umpire did just fine. But I've been umpiring longer than I ever played.

"Draw a line up there..." I'm still chuckling.
Whats the difference between a batter saying, again I think everyone here knows the batter was incorrect in his rule knowledge, "I have as much time as I want" and a player yelling for an infield fly call when there is 2 outs bc they dont know the rules?

Youre certainly not going to eject the player in the infield fly situation, so why eject the batter???? Either tell him to get in the box, or start assessing whatever penalty is prescribed in the rule book for the batter not taking his stance in a timely fashion. ZERO need to eject at this point in time. You'd have a better argument (albeit still unwarranted IMO) if you ejected when the batter did his "golf swing" warmup.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 10, 2009, 09:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveshane67 View Post
The umps shouldnt be going out of their way to "take the bat out of the players hand", let the players play.
Then the players should do just that: play. Don't stand around taking as much time as you want.

Last edited by briancurtin; Fri Jul 10, 2009 at 09:16pm.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 10, 2009, 09:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveshane67 View Post
Whats the difference between a batter saying, again I think everyone here knows the batter was incorrect in his rule knowledge, "I have as much time as I want" and a player yelling for an infield fly call when there is 2 outs bc they dont know the rules?
One player doesn't know the rule and is an ***. The other just doesn't know the rule.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 10, 2009, 10:49pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveshane67 View Post
No, You Lose
No, it's still you.



Quote:
Originally Posted by steveshane67 View Post
The ump ejected the batter after he wrongly asserted that he has as much time as he wants. to my knowledge, it is not an ejectionable offense to misunderstand the rules, or else there be no one playing ball!!!
Anyone who thinks they can address the umpire, who is generally a grown man, who just happens to be the boss on the field, by yelling at them that they can do what they please after being legally ordered to comply is subject to getting run from the yard in a hurry. If you were an umpire, you would know that, then wouldn't you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveshane67 View Post
and besides, in any given baseball game there are about 30 objections to decisions, I think you need to reconsider the umps role in the game. The umps shouldnt be going out of their way to "take the bat out of the players hand", let the players play.
Umpires don't eject players or coaches, players and coaches eject themselves by their actions. By rule, judgment calls cannot be objected to, so I don't know where you get 30 objections. I get my calls right, and very rarely do I have to eject someone. But you tell me what to do, you better get packing, because only one of us will be still in the game, and it won't be you.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 10, 2009, 11:24pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
You need to buy a tape measure. Three or four baseballs above the belt is the armpit. That hasn't been a strike by the book in a loooooooong time.

A little more than the height of one baseball above the top of the uniform pants is a strike by the book. That's the midpoint described in the rule.
Halfway between the belt and shoulders is not 3 inches above the belt on any normal player I know.

Last edited by DG; Fri Jul 10, 2009 at 11:37pm.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 11, 2009, 07:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 371
Years ago, had a batter walking away after a called 3K. He then stops, turns around and uses his bat to point at home plate. He said "The plate is over there, Blue" I pointed to his dugout and said " The bench is over there!" He then continued to go back to his bench.
His whole bench erupted in laughter, so I didn't dump him. I started to chuckle.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 11, 2009, 09:13am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR12 View Post
Years ago, had a batter walking away after a called 3K. He then stops, turns around and uses his bat to point at home plate. He said "The plate is over there, Blue" I pointed to his dugout and said " The bench is over there!" He then continued to go back to his bench.
His whole bench erupted in laughter, so I didn't dump him. I started to chuckle.
This is true. Sometimes it's more fun not to eject the clown, just turn their whole bench loose on them. It depends on the situation and the overall atmosphere of the game.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 11, 2009, 11:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SW Kansas
Posts: 728
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve View Post
This is true. Sometimes it's more fun not to eject the clown, just turn their whole bench loose on them. It depends on the situation and the overall atmosphere of the game.
There's a quote in this year's CCA Manual that says something about a "well timed sense of humor to defuse situations." I'm at work so I don't have it in front of me but I'm guessing this is what they're talking about.
__________________
Selling my Original WV CP. $65 + shipping. PM me for details.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 11, 2009, 12:45pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbybanaduck View Post
ummmmm, a better question....

why AREN'T you calling it? (assuming you aren't from this posed question and your "thank you" response later in the thread.)

The STRIKE ZONE is that area over home plate the upper limit of which is a horizontal line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of the uniform pants, and the lower level is a line at the hollow beneath the kneecap.



bobbybanaduck:

Thank you for the OBR (Rule 2.00--STRIKE ZONE) definition, but since about 99.999,999% of my games are played using NFHS Rules which R2-S35-A1 states: "The strike zone is that space over home plate, the top of which is halfway between the batter’s shoulders and the waistline, and the bottom being the knees,
when he assumes his natural batting stance. The height of the strike zone is
determined by the batter’s normal batting stance. If he crouches or leans over to make the shoulder line lower, the umpire determines height by what would be the batter’s normal stance."

That means in a NFHS Rules game, a pitch below the knees is not a strike. I only questioned the author of the OP because I was reading his post from the NFHS Rules position.

I have never been a proponent of the "real" low strike, but have been a proponent of the "high" strike. I just don't think a batter should have to use a golf swing to hit a baseball.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 11, 2009, 12:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 371
Let's not have a big arguement over an inch!

Last edited by JR12; Sat Jul 11, 2009 at 01:04pm.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 11, 2009, 05:35pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. View Post
I have never been a proponent of the "real" low strike, but have been a proponent of the "high" strike. I just don't think a batter should have to use a golf swing to hit a baseball.
I have tried several times to post a JPG I scanned from Ted Williams book in hitting where he shows what his batting average would be based on the spots. Can't seem to get it done.

But the low strike was Ted's lowest batting average, and therefore pitcher should be rewarded for throwing it there. Ted would bat .400 on pitches over the middle as much as 3-4 baseballs above the belt and in the 300's on pitches above his hands. Obviously, Ted liked the high pitch better than the low.

There is a lesson there. If the pitcher throws a low strike call it, he deserves it. Batters will adjust. If he throws a high strike that don't get hammered call it, because the batter should be able to hammer it.

I have been told I call them low, but everybody knows it too, so I don't get any complaints.

Last edited by DG; Sat Jul 11, 2009 at 05:47pm.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 11, 2009, 06:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Although I've been told by fellow umpires that I have a higher strike zone (I'll call the pitch at the belt a strike....a lot of guys won't), I still try to get pitches at the hollow of the knee for strikes. If you're consistent with it, no one will say a word.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Both ways johnnyg08 Baseball 18 Sat May 09, 2009 08:26am
New use for "Call It Both Ways" Mark Padgett Basketball 34 Sat Dec 24, 2005 08:35pm
At Bat Batter ejected - What's the count? officialtony Baseball 8 Tue May 31, 2005 08:18pm
Batter ejected WestMichBlue Softball 12 Thu Jul 29, 2004 03:10pm
Both ways mick Basketball 17 Thu Sep 27, 2001 09:33am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1