|
Wed Sep 12, 2007, 12:27am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I didn't mean to. The point I was trying to make is that bobbybanaduck seems to suggest that it would be improper to award the BR 2B because he never "completed" his effort to reach 2B after he was obstructed. I believe that is not a proper criteria for determining the correct ruling on the play. Forest seemed to have been suffering under the misapprehension that a runner can NEVER be awarded an advance base on a Type B obstruction - which the case play I cited shows is patently wrong. Somebody doesn't understand how to rule on Type B obstruction under OBR. Maybe it's me. Havng seen the video, where would you have placed the BR if his 1B coach hadn't shoved him towards 2B? JM P.S. I would concur with your assessment of U3's performace on the play in question.
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all. Last edited by UmpJM; Wed Sep 12, 2007 at 12:33am. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Coach's Interference? | Armadillo_Blue | Baseball | 13 | Tue Aug 08, 2006 01:41am |
| coach's interference | NavyCoach | Baseball | 8 | Wed Jun 15, 2005 01:35pm |
| Interference v. Obstruction | Dougie | Softball | 14 | Tue Apr 16, 2002 08:54pm |
| Obstruction and Interference | spots101 | Baseball | 6 | Sun Mar 03, 2002 02:32pm |
| Interference, Obstruction or nothing. | Gre144 | Baseball | 10 | Thu May 17, 2001 07:27pm |
Threaded Mode
