|
(R3 comes down and makes contact with F2 with his shoulder first, after the throw went past F2)
(If this was NCAA/NF play, would you have called a malicious crash, obstruction, interference, or a combo of those?)
No! because the attempt to field the ball had passed before the contact,,, The catcher did not have time to get out of the way after the missed attempt...
Runner is not at fault unless the ball was being fielded or in the possesion of the catcher.
There is an argument for obstruction, therefore if the kid had not made the plate, he could be awarded that plate.
This is a stupid coaches oppinion, so dont sue me ump.
|
Wed Aug 17, 2005, 02:20pm
Hybrid Mode
