The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2004, 11:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Sorry but I disagree

Quote:
Originally posted by DG
Quote:
Originally posted by David B
Quote:
Originally posted by Blue37
Quote:
Originally posted by DG
I will read the rest of the posts later, but respond first. Joe is PU. "Joe said it looked to him like the batter was safe" and BU wanted him to say that he was off the bag so they can get it right, but then Joe told you "the 1st baseman stretched hard toward second to receive the relay and did come off the bag after receiving the throw, but was definitely in contact with the bag when the throw was received". Sounds like Joe, the PU, can't make up his mind.
DG,

I apologize for giving any indication that Joe was indecisive. He said he watched the FPSR at second then swiveled to first to watch for the pulled foot/swipe tag. He felt the batter beat the throw and was surprised by the out call, although it was a bang-bang play.

The whole thrust of this question is that the base ump kicked the call, knew he kicked the call, but did not have the courage to correct his error. He asked the PU to compromise his integrity by lying in the interest of "getting it right".

P.S. As I am sure you have surmised, this is a hypothetical situation made up to generate more discussion about what lengths should be taken to get the call right.
Wait a minute. Its a bang bang play at first and the PU who is half way to the mound can see that the batter beat the throw.

I don't even want to go there.

Its a bang bang play live with the call.

Its BU's call all the way.

PU keep his mouth shut and return to the plate for the next pitch.

And if a coach asks me, I'm going to tell him, "ask the BU, he made the call."

This is getting ridiculous.

thanks
David
The only reason I would discuss this with BU is to tell him that he has made a call and we will live with it. Because we discussed it, and did not change the call, it gives appearance that agreement is reached, without having to lie about it. Plus, it gives me good opportunity to make sure BU knows that if he wants help on a call he has to ask before he makes the call, not after. This would have been a pre-game emphasis that he forgot in the heat of the bang-bang play. [/B]
We are at the game to umpire. I don;t need the BU coming to me after every close pitch just to give the appearance that agreement has been reached.

If I'm the PU, I have responsibilities. That does not include making sure that we are in agreement or give the appearance of agreement on every call.

My BU surely needs to know I support him, and if its a pulled foot then surely he can ask for help etc.,

But, on a "bang bang play" as the original poster said the play at first was, then that is BU's call all the way. There is nothing to discuss.

If BU is a young umpire, I might say loudly "good call" just to keep his confidence up, but I'm not going to even hint that I have anything to do with the play.

If a coach wants a discussion, then he can go to the umpire who made the call period.

If the BU wants to talk to me, then I'll quickly answer his questions and then continue the game. We as umpires don't ever need to give the impression that we call the game by committee.

BU has responsibilities and PU has responsibilities. The only things that need to be discussed are rule interpretations.

Thanks
David
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2004, 11:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 39
Send a message via AIM to ecurebel
Asking for assistance on a foot pull may save you time for processing a call but in the end it may also make you look like you don't know what was up...cuz if you ask for a footpull and you get no and you call him safe they are going to question what is up.

So basically what I am saying is don't ask for assistance on a call about a footpull or a tag if you know you are going to get the answer of yes he was tagged or no the foot wasn't pulled. you know that you fluffed it.. either remake the call right there...your judgment is going to be attacked either way, but if you get the call right thats one thing, letting another coach feel that you are being coerced by the opposing team is the other.. just live with it, or change it before anything is said (you are going to look like an idiot either way but if ray charles could see that he was safe and you banged him changing it before anything is said might help..)

main thing is slow down with the bang bang plays and think things through about where the ball was where the foot was and what not you wouldn't have to change a call that you fluffed. it don't matter whether you make the call as the play happens, a couple seconds/mins later, or next week, as long as you get the dang call to mirror the play you just saw...cuz calling it like you see it is the most important integrity part of baseball...

every call could go against one team but if at the games end you could walk out the parking lot with your partner to change and get ready to leave and are capable of saying i called the game to the best of what i knew...then you did your job well
__________________
while umpiring I have yet to WIN, LOSE, or even TIE a game. I am only there to call it like I see it.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 30, 2004, 08:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
...one thing for sure, if my partner asked me in conference, on the field, to lie to cover up a stich like that, that would be the last time I ever worked with him (or he with me). That's BS.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 30, 2004, 08:51am
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 554
Exclamation Advice

ecurebel -

Not sure where you work or what level...

So basically what I am saying is don't ask for assistance on a call about a footpull or a tag if you know you are going to get the answer of yes he was tagged or no the foot wasn't pulled.

Why, if you didn't have the angle, why wouldn't you ask. Ego???

you know that you fluffed it.. either remake the call right there...your judgment is going to be attacked either way, but if you get the call right thats one thing, letting another coach feel that you are being coerced by the opposing team is the other..

No...the opposing team won't have a chance to influence me if I do it right. Hit, fielder throws...catch...look at my partner who is up the line looking at the back end..."Did he have the bag?" make my call. Not difficult and pride should not be part of it. I would rather look bad and get the call right, than guess and get the call wrong, just to look like I know what I'm doing. Then, you will have one coach screaming at you!

main thing is slow down with the bang bang plays and think things through about where the ball was where the foot was and what not you wouldn't have to change a call that you fluffed.

Slow down...good advice...but what if you don't have a good angle? Fluffing it has nothing to do with asking for another look and then making the call. All you are asking for is whether the guy had the bag or a tag. It is your judgement that calls the final play.

every call could go against one team but if at the games end you could walk out the parking lot with your partner to change and get ready to leave and are capable of saying i called the game to the best of what i knew...then you did your job well

Not if your pride prevented you from asking for another look when you know you were screened or out of position.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 03, 2004, 03:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 109
In these kind of situations(judgement calls) here's how I think it should happen:
1) The umpire whose call it is makes the call first, according to what HE saw. After all that's why he's there in the first place.
2) If one of the managers/coaches thinks that the calling umpire missed the call because of bad angle, distance, etc. then that manager/coach asks the calling umpire to ask the other umpire who may have had a better angle, etc.
3) The calling umpire then has the option to either ask for help or not. If he does not ask for help that's it. The calling umpire trusts his own judgement, and that he got it right. However, if he does ask for help then in essence he is saying "From my perspective this is what I saw, but I realize that the other man had a better look. Therefore I am deferring to what he saw and how he judges the play."

This kind of sitch happened to me this season. Cal Ripken(OBR) league, R2 no outs. Small field so I'm in C behind and between 2B and F6. BR hits a slow tapper fair up 1B line. F1 fields the ball and tries to tag BR running by him instead of tossing to F3. Even though I'm 70-80' away from the play and have about the worst angle to the play in the entire park, it's my call. I replay the entire scene in my head stand slowly and signal safe because that's what I saw from my lousy perspective. I don't ask the PU to make the call in my stead, because that's not why I'm there. The defensive coach yells out "Hey Blue, you had a terrible angle on that! Ask the other guy!" I know I had a bad angle and asked the PU whou had followed the BR up a few steps. I pointed to him and he rang the BR up. We got the call right without hurt feelings, controversy, etc. Now if I had refused to ask the PU then I would have to live or die with my call myself. But as I understand it, I was the only one on that ball field who could ask the PU what he saw, and by the simple act of asking I was deferring to his judgement.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1