double base discussion

[Tru_in_Blu]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

Why do you think it doesn't belong in the section about when a BR is out...

BR is the only one that can be out for touching the wrong half of the base. It cannot be in the section about when a RUNNER is out because a runner cannot be called out for touching the wrong half of the base (which, incidentally, is how you explain it to the coach, and when he trots out rule 8.2 and you point out to him that ENTIRE SECTION is about the batter-runner, and the player he's complaining about is a runner... the discussion is over).

It doesn't belong in the section because it doesn't follow the protocol for when a BR would be out. The first 2 sub-bullets are describing when a batted ball is fair or foul. What does THAT have to do with when a BR is out?

The issue was not about a runner touching whatever base, it was about the defense allegedly using the wrong base.

It doesn't belong because when tagging up on a fly ball, the runner can use either portion of the bag.

It doesn't belong because on an attempted pickoff the RUNNER may return to the white or colored portion of the base. What does THAT have to do with when a BR is out?

So it shouldn't be in the section about when the BR is out; it shouldn't be in the section about when the runner is out; it shouldn't be in the section about when the runner is not out.

It's a mish-mash of fair/foul, BR requirements and exceptions, and runner and defender allowances.

It belongs by itself as a stand alone entity somewhere in Rule 8.