|
Sat May 03, 2014, 08:14pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know there's a case play about a batter heading to first base on ball three, instead of ball four. It's 3.6.13(B).
And it's a rather Draconian case play. It says that if the umpire judges this to be an intentional act (mind reader?) he can eject the player! I've wondered if this same ruling could apply when a batter runs on an uncaught strike two. Wouldn't that be the same thing? Both involve a batter running to first base, mimicking a batter-runner, when not entitled to, apparently to gain some sort of advantage over the defense. 
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rule Clarification | PIAA REF | Basketball | 11 | Tue Nov 02, 2010 03:06pm |
| Rule 2-10 Clarification | Burtis449 | Basketball | 3 | Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:34am |
| Rule Clarification | BigToe | Basketball | 5 | Wed Nov 16, 2005 06:21pm |
| Rule Clarification | Dennis Nicely | Basketball | 5 | Mon Feb 19, 2001 01:42pm |
| Clarification on NFHS Rule | Paul LeBoutillier | Basketball | 1 | Wed Nov 15, 2000 12:22pm |
Threaded Mode
