The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 26, 2014, 09:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 81
NFHS - BOO Play & Penalty

No outs, R1 on 1st. It's B2's turn to bat, but B3 bats out of order and hits into a 6-4-3 double play. Defense now appeals BOO and UIC upholds the appeal.

How many outs are there now and who should be batting next.

I know that by rule 7-1-2 Penalty 2, "all outs stand", but our state interpreter thinks this is a triple play. I think the fact that the improper batter's turn at bat is "negated" causes the out on R1 to stand, B2 declared out for failing to bat, and B3 becomes the next batter with two outs.

Does anyone out there know the correct NFHS interpretation?
__________________
Don't be afraid to try new things.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 26, 2014, 09:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
How can you have an out on a batter whos turn at bat is negated? Im pretty sure this was on the FED test either last year or the year before. All outs stand except for any out made on the improper batter. You have the call correct, the out at 2nd stands, the improper batters at bat is negated, the batter who should have batted B2 is out and the correct batter is B3.

Under former ASA rules this would have been a triple play, but ASA changed their rules to match the FED ruling.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 26, 2014, 09:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
How can you have an out on a batter whos turn at bat is negated? Im pretty sure this was on the FED test either last year or the year before. All outs stand except for any out made on the improper batter. You have the call correct, the out at 2nd stands, the improper batters at bat is negated, the batter who should have batted B2 is out and the correct batter is B3.

Under former ASA rules this would have been a triple play, but ASA changed their rules to match the FED ruling.
NFHS rule -yep.
ASA comment - yep.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 26, 2014, 10:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 648
Yup, need runners starting at 2nd & 1st (and plays at 3rd & 2nd) to get a triple-play with BOO...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 26, 2014, 10:05am
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Inform the state interpreter to take a look at NFHS Case Play 7.1.2H (emphasis in red is mine):

7.1.2 SITUATION H: Batter B1 is due up but B2 bats instead. B2 hits a ground ball and is (a) safe at first or (b) thrown out at first. The defensive team properly appeals batting out of order. RULING: In both (a) and (b), the player who should have batted, B1 is declared out by the umpire and B2's turn at bat is nullified. In (a), B2 is removed from first base. In both (a) and (b), B2 is now the proper batter and bats again with one out and no runners on base. (7-1-2 Penalty)

Note that the out at first base in (b) doesn't count. The only out recorded is on B1 for failing to bat in the proper order.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 26, 2014, 03:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 414
Can I ask for clarification please. ASA 2014 (7-2-D2-c) Last sentence. Still says any outs remain outs, and does not state an exception for when the improper batter is one of the outs.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 26, 2014, 03:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck chopper View Post
Can I ask for clarification please. ASA 2014 (7-2-D2-c) Last sentence. Still says any outs remain outs, and does not state an exception for when the improper batter is one of the outs.
7-2-D-2-a The improper batters time at bat is negated.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Declined Penalty on a play with a TD commish34 Football 8 Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:27pm
NFHS Ruling on Penalty at End of Game TXMike Football 12 Fri Dec 07, 2007 05:02pm
Proper NFHS enforcement of this penalty? tskill Football 17 Fri Aug 10, 2007 01:48pm
Penalty Enforcement - NFHS Florida Rookie Football 9 Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:41am
NFHS Rule 3 Sec. 5 Art 3 Penalty whiskers_ump Softball 7 Sun Mar 21, 2004 04:35pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1