![]() |
|
|||
7-6-Q: By actively hindering the catcher while in the batter's box.
A) this was not active, it was passive. Active implies an intentional act of some sort. B) the catcher was not hindered - the ball was. Going through each line of this rule, none of them says or even implies that this batter should be out. Edit to add: I'm not intentionally trying to avoid your question. I can not provide a rule reference that says the batter is not out - but we don't call outs simply because we feel like it... outs come from "The batter is out when ..." - and if none of those statements apply, then the batter is not out. There is no section that lists all the things a batter can do and NOT be out...
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike Last edited by MD Longhorn; Tue Sep 18, 2012 at 11:37am. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Umpire Interference / Batter Interference | bob jenkins | Baseball | 17 | Mon Feb 06, 2012 09:57pm |
Batter Interference? | BretMan | Softball | 13 | Mon Jan 23, 2012 02:03pm |
Batter Interference | Tweet | Baseball | 7 | Mon Aug 13, 2007 06:30pm |
Batter Interference | Umpire47 | Baseball | 15 | Thu Sep 15, 2005 06:49pm |
Batter interference? | jesmael | Baseball | 7 | Thu Jun 10, 2004 02:08pm |