From another forum, coach putting spit on ball

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by topper

They indeed do - before the game.

Are you saying you would allow a coach to put anything on the ball between innings based on what's done prior to the game? Where do you draw the line? Most importantly, please site the supporting rule as well.

Is that what I said and, BTW, the coach didn't put anything on the ball, did he?

BTW, YOU cite the rule forbidding the coach from doing what was described in the OP.

[Stu Clary]

Why is the coach handling the ball?

[Stu Clary]

Originally Posted by Stu Clary

Why is the coach handling the ball?

Just curious.

[JefferMC]

I've seen several coaches, when their team is in the 1B dugout, will stroll to the circle from the 3B coaches box after their third out on offense, pick up the ball and wait for his pitcher to get there (or will wait somewhere between the circle and 1B).

That's what I'm picturing here.

[youngump]

Originally Posted by JefferMC

I've seen several coaches, when their team is in the 1B dugout, will stroll to the circle from the 3B coaches box after their third out on offense, pick up the ball and wait for his pitcher to get there (or will wait somewhere between the circle and 1B).

That's what I'm picturing here.

If you toss them when this happens, you can totally avoid the problem in this thread.
________
Los Angeles Dispensary Reviews

[Stu Clary]

Originally Posted by JefferMC

I've seen several coaches, when their team is in the 1B dugout, will stroll to the circle from the 3B coaches box after their third out on offense, pick up the ball and wait for his pitcher to get there (or will wait somewhere between the circle and 1B).

That's what I'm picturing here.

Originally Posted by youngump

If you toss them when this happens, you can totally avoid the problem in this thread.

That might be a little drastic...but if he's spitting on the ball? Hmmmm. Maybe charge a defensive conference?

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by Stu Clary

but if he's spitting on the ball?

Does anyone actually read these things?

[KJUmp]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

Is that what I said and, BTW, the coach didn't put anything on the ball, did he?

BTW, YOU cite the rule forbidding the coach from doing what was described in the OP.

So if a situation called for it, we would be OK using 6.6.A. with a coach if they were in some manner applying a foreign substance to the ball?

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by KJUmp

So if a situation called for it, we would be OK using 6.6.A. with a coach if they were in some manner applying a foreign substance to the ball?

Don't know, would you?

Even if you thought you were, I believe this to be over-officiating at its extreme. This is one of those things that some umpire gets talked into enforcing by a coach because "rules are rules" and we end up with another ridiculous thread about TWPs.

Think about it. A coach moistens HIS HANDS (not the ball), picks up a ball and rubs it down, hands the ball to the pitcher who then throws five warm-up pitches to the catcher who is now handling the ball with her glove and throwing hand as many times as their are pitches, then throws the ball to F4 who throws the ball to F6 who throws the ball to F....well, you get the point.

So, after this ball has been thrown and caught in a glove 13 times, just what is going to happen on the first pitch that was effected by the coach spitting on his/her hands?

Oh, here it comes........EVEN IF the pitcher threw no warm-up pitches, the coach's actions would still would not affect the pitch.

Go ahead, make that call. What you do with the boogers you find is your business. I know it will not be mine.

[KJUmp]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

Don't know, would you?

Even if you thought you were, I believe this to be over-officiating at its extreme. This is one of those things that some umpire gets talked into enforcing by a coach because "rules are rules" and we end up with another ridiculous thread about TWPs.

Think about it. A coach moistens HIS HANDS (not the ball), picks up a ball and rubs it down, hands the ball to the pitcher who then throws five warm-up pitches to the catcher who is now handling the ball with her glove and throwing hand as many times as their are pitches, then throws the ball to F4 who throws the ball to F6 who throws the ball to F....well, you get the point.

So, after this ball has been thrown and caught in a glove 13 times, just what is going to happen on the first pitch that was effected by the coach spitting on his/her hands?

Oh, here it comes........EVEN IF the pitcher threw no warm-up pitches, the coach's actions would still would not affect the pitch.

Go ahead, make that call. What you do with the boogers you find is your business. I know it will not be mine.

I'm not looking to be an OOO or pick a booger on the field. I'm just trying to get clear on how ASA would want the sitch in the OP handled should it arise and, understand the correct application/interpretation of 6.6.A.
If ASA sees it as non issue or a violation, then it's not a booger I'll pick if I happened to see a DC doing it. If an OC should observe it and complain about the DC I now know what to tell him.

[MD Longhorn]

I still question why you would WANT to make a point of calling this?

[NCASAUmp]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

I still question why you would WANT to make a point of calling this?

Wanting to do something and having to do something do not necessarily go hand-in-hand.

What if the coach actually does put something besides spit on the ball? Are we going to stick with the technicality of "this rule only applies to players, not coaches?"

Either the spit is a foreign substance or it isn't.

[MD Longhorn]

I'm wondering about the want. There is no have. You don't HAVE to rule this illegal, because it's not.

But 2 or 3 of you obviously WANT to - either by warping one rule improperly to fit what you want into it,or by using the God rule unnecessarily. My question is... "Why?"

[topper]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

I still question why you would WANT to make a point of calling this?

Because it's an IP in college and a coach putting a foreign substance on the ball at other levels needs to be addressed.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by topper

Because it's an IP in college

Irrelevant.

and a coach putting a foreign substance on the ball at other levels needs to be addressed.

I'll say it again... WHY?