Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
I understand that. And because you expect it of me, let me add, No $ hit! 
However, my question still stands. If ASA goes through the trouble of addressing a deflected ball in three of the four paragraphs, why would you assume the paragraph that does not also applies? If you look at paragraph #1 and apply it to all live, fair batted balls, deflected or otherwise, would that not make the three subsequent paragraphs redundant? |
Editing oversights? Redundancies and over-clarifications?
__________________
Dave
I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!
Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!
I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
|
Sat Sep 11, 2010, 08:31am
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
