Multiple Obstructions

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

Where did I say it did?

How about here:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

...According to the rule quoted by Tom, there is no more discussion available here....

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

No, it is not.

Yes, it is. My turn to emphasize...

BU resignals the obstruction, and based on where the ball is and where the runner is,again decides that based on this OBS alone, she should get 3rd.

Based on "this OBS alone"... i.e. not considering the previous obstruction. The effect of the previous obstruction is not rendered moot by a second violation by the same team. That the calling umpire did not take this into consideration at the time of the second obstruction does not mean he cannot reconsider and take it into account later before making the base award. The effect of both obstructions is to be removed for the proper base award. The umpire is not locked down merely because he did not consider that at the instant of the second obstruction.

Theorizing that the PU "talked him into" something is adding illegitimacy to the OP that is not present as described.