![]() |
|
|||
Interesting differentiation,
I'm at work and without a rule book and since I'm not working HS ball this year I have not studied up on NFHS -- It seems in NFHS's effort to write it a different way, they (IMO inadvertantly) change entire interpretations. This is the same thing as leaving "play" out of interference. I still got a noncall, if I'm on the field right now, and i guess the wrong call.. but I'm not calling OBS on a fielder in the immediate act of fielding a batted ball. The ONLY reason step and reach is an issue ever is because the fielder is relocating, conceivably into a new new path, and receiving further/extra protection - To me, since deflection is not the issue - the fielder still in the same position immediately after the miss (ie a dive, or bending over whatever - still in the immediate act - although ultimately unsucessful) that is still fielding the ball. Since NFHS is not interested in "fielding the ball" I suppose I should bow out of the discussion and leave it to you NFHS gurus.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS Last edited by wadeintothem; Wed Mar 04, 2009 at 02:35pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
Thats pretty conclusive.. not sure I agree with it, but that doesnt matter - definitely the rule. Obviously the same thing would apply to a diving play and I'm not sure about that; but no doubt how they want it called. I guess the moral is: catch it.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
was a force play, became a tag play ? | _Bruno_ | Baseball | 8 | Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:13am |
Play-by-Play Commentary | FC IC | Basketball | 2 | Sat Dec 21, 2002 12:28am |
CBS play-by-play announcers: should they all be fired? | David Clausi | Basketball | 6 | Mon Mar 27, 2000 11:56pm |