|
League president definitely had a conflict of interest. Decision should have been made 1. earlier, 2. more equitable and 3. by someone else.
1. why make this kind of decision when championships are on the line.
2. could have been as other mentioned, severely limit number of innings pitch for ALL pitchers.
3. definitely should have had a third party make this decision.
Not sure where I stand on the decision, seems unfair but can understand. Either way, it appears improperly motivated.
I'm still hoping we can find a way to get parents out of youth rec ball.
__________________
Dan
|
Thu Aug 28, 2008, 05:27am
Similar Threads
Hybrid Mode
