![]() |
|
|
|||
In the 2013 ASA NUS in Lewiston, ME, we were told by Jim Craig that the PU has responsibility to call INT at second base on a double play ball.
__________________
Ted USA & NFHS Softball |
|
|||
Quote:
If there is no throw to first, the base umpire is in the best position to make a credible call of runner interference. But, if a throw (or throw attempt) takes BU's head to first for the (presumably close) play there, THEN the PU has to be watching the remainder of the play and interaction at second; and be prepared to rule interference if appropriate. This is case where PU may several responsibilities all at once; a possible lead runner around third, possible runner from third touching the plate, interaction on the batted ball with defensive players and runners, interaction at second on the front end of the double play effort, and a possible pulled foot or swipe tag at first base on the back end.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
Maybe, but definitely not absolute. BU has the calls at 2nd & 1st. If the PU sees a runner interfere, s/he should be damn sure of what they are calling from 25-30 yards away when the BU is right there.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
5 man mechanics | parepat | Football | 21 | Fri Aug 27, 2010 01:00pm |
Four man mechanics | clev1967 | Softball | 17 | Thu May 14, 2009 01:15pm |
NCAA Mechanics, NFHS Rules/Mechanics | InvisibleRef | Basketball | 4 | Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06am |
5-man mechanics on KO (Fed) | TXMike | Football | 9 | Mon Jul 28, 2003 01:28am |
ASA mechanics | oppool | Softball | 11 | Fri Jun 27, 2003 05:20pm |