The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Soccer
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 05, 2006, 09:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to phatneff Send a message via Yahoo to phatneff
Dangerous Play

Call or no call???

Player A is trying to clear the ball from the penalty area and in doing so lifts his leg to clear the ball. The foot comes up to about where the knee is, so it wasn't very high and within a normal kicking motion. Player B, who is trying to keep the ball in the area, bends down to head the ball and does so right at the point of where the foot of Player A is clearing the ball. Player A's foot makes contact with Player B's head. Is this a dangerous play call for either Player A or B, or no call at all?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 05, 2006, 01:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by phatneff
Call or no call???

Player A is trying to clear the ball from the penalty area and in doing so lifts his leg to clear the ball. The foot comes up to about where the knee is, so it wasn't very high and within a normal kicking motion. Player B, who is trying to keep the ball in the area, bends down to head the ball and does so right at the point of where the foot of Player A is clearing the ball. Player A's foot makes contact with Player B's head. Is this a dangerous play call for either Player A or B, or no call at all?
What was the sequence? Dangerous play would seem to be an infraction by whoever acted last.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 05, 2006, 03:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to phatneff Send a message via Yahoo to phatneff
I disagree. I called a dangerous play on Player B as she was putting herself in a dangerous position by lowering her head below her waste rather than using other viable parts of her body.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 05, 2006, 04:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,955
CecilOne, I have to disagree with you. Phtneff had this one right in my sometimes less IMO. This is danderous play on B. She was the one who put herself in the bad postion by having her head so low. IK for A.
__________________
That's my whistle -- and I'm sticking to it!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 05, 2006, 06:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
OK, and ruling 12-6-B seems to support your view.
I'm not sure that will change my perception. Doesn't depend on what the players could foresee?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.

Last edited by CecilOne; Sun Oct 08, 2006 at 09:28am.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 05, 2006, 06:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by phatneff
I disagree. I called a dangerous play on Player B as she was putting herself in a dangerous position by lowering her head below her waste rather than using other viable parts of her body.
If you are already certain of your call, then why bother to ask on this forum?

BTW, did the player put her head below her waist or her rear?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 06, 2006, 10:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to phatneff Send a message via Yahoo to phatneff
Ooops, WAIST!

And, it shouldn't matter how I called it or not. I am asking to get other people's opinions to know if they would have made the same call. And, as expected, there was a different opinion. I received a lot of heat from the opposing coach for the call so I wanted to know if others would have called the same thing. A big misconception is that a "high kick" is a foul (same with "playing on the ground"). People don't understand that the proper call is dangerous play and the foul is called against the person who is putting the opponent, or as in this case, herself, in danger.

Trust me, I'm very confident in my calls. I don't need to come on here to validate the calls I make. If I did, I wouldn't be an official. This is a discussion forum, not a testing forum.

Last edited by phatneff; Fri Oct 06, 2006 at 10:37am.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 07, 2006, 05:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,014
I agree with that philosophy, however your previous post did not indicate such from you.

Rather than post a scenario and wait for feedback from other officials, you jumped in with "I disagree," after the very first respondent expressed an opinion that differed from yours.

You certainly seemed to be asking and answering your own question.
What's the point of that?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 11, 2006, 02:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to phatneff Send a message via Yahoo to phatneff
No offense, Nevada, but I hope I never have to ref with you or play a game in which you are reffing. Your comments come across as tedious and trifling, which I hope aren't reflective of the way you officiate a match.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 11, 2006, 04:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by phatneff
No offense, Nevada, but I hope I never have to ref with you or play a game in which you are reffing. Your comments come across as tedious and trifling, which I hope aren't reflective of the way you officiate a match.
On a discussion forum, the precision of replies is usually appreciated, even if they seem long/tedious and pin down the details/trifles.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 12, 2006, 07:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to phatneff Send a message via Yahoo to phatneff
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne
On a discussion forum, the precision of replies is usually appreciated, even if they seem long/tedious and pin down the details/trifles.

Cecil, thanks for jumping in (direct foul), but i was referring to his comments about my posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The only thing more dangerous.... just another ref Basketball 6 Wed Dec 14, 2005 09:44pm
Dangerous Play? wardtc Soccer 8 Fri Sep 09, 2005 09:10am
Dangerous, Deadly Dangerous DownTownTonyBrown Baseball 27 Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:53am
Play-by-Play Commentary FC IC Basketball 2 Sat Dec 21, 2002 12:28am
CBS play-by-play announcers: should they all be fired? David Clausi Basketball 6 Mon Mar 27, 2000 11:56pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1