Forum: Basketball
Tue Feb 08, 2011, 10:25am
|
|
Replies: 67
Views: 8,538
Maybe so, but I don't think so
I'm a logical person. It's part of my character. I'm not saying anyone else on this board isn't logical. It's just that I'm a software engineer by training and I think very analytically.
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Feb 08, 2011, 10:23am
|
|
Replies: 67
Views: 8,538
No I don't mean that
What I am saying is the rule book is wrong logically in saying that POI is the arrow. In the scenario we are talking about the event that is taking place is a shot attempt, not an AP Throw-in. ...
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Feb 08, 2011, 09:36am
|
|
Replies: 67
Views: 8,538
Correct
But they are covered under different parts of the rule. I was specifically talking about this scenario, so my comments should be taken in context. But you already know this. ;)
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Feb 08, 2011, 09:13am
|
|
Replies: 67
Views: 8,538
I said that
In a previous post, I made this same point! :)
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Feb 08, 2011, 08:35am
|
|
Replies: 67
Views: 8,538
I agree
Both of us will get the play correct and for the same reason. We have no team control when the double foul was called and therefore we go with AP.
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Feb 08, 2011, 08:26am
|
|
Replies: 67
Views: 8,538
What I'm saying is...
I agree the AP is a method of resuming play, but it is used when we have no other way of putting the ball in play. Number 1 is used when the POI is when one team has control of the ball. This could...
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Feb 08, 2011, 07:50am
|
|
Replies: 67
Views: 8,538
I am One and for good reason
The term point of interruption means to resume play where the play was interrupted. Was the play interrupted duirng an AP Throw-in? No. It was interrupted during a shot attempt. The AP is just...
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jan 13, 2011, 01:16pm
|
|
Replies: 46
Views: 7,293
Actually you do but....
You do have authority to T up a team for unsportmanlike conduct of their fans. However, the rule book says you "may" enforce a Technical but strongly suggests otherwise. I've never T'd up a team...
|
Forum: Basketball
Mon Jan 03, 2011, 03:59pm
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 8,330
Tape's not the only reason
I like the stop sign and we use it my area of Georgia. Maybe that's why I like it because I've been instructed to use it. It does work, but that depends on your definition of "work". If you...
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Dec 30, 2010, 12:43pm
|
|
Replies: 139
Views: 16,926
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Dec 30, 2010, 11:38am
|
|
Replies: 139
Views: 16,926
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Dec 30, 2010, 09:09am
|
|
Replies: 139
Views: 16,926
Wow!
We are having a friendly debate and then you resort to this! WOW!
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Dec 30, 2010, 08:52am
|
|
Replies: 139
Views: 16,926
No of course not
All I am asking is for you to show me the rule that says you can't wipe out the T. You haven't yet! This is not covered by rule 2.10. There are other things we correct that is not listed under...
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Dec 30, 2010, 08:30am
|
|
Replies: 139
Views: 16,926
No this is not covered
No you are agreeing with me. You agree this is not a correctable error therefore rule 2.10 doesn't apply. Yet you have failed to show me the rule that says categorically that a T can't be wiped...
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Dec 30, 2010, 08:13am
|
|
Replies: 139
Views: 16,926
No I haven't.
The only time the rule book says you can't wipe out a T is during a correctable error. Period! End of story! This is not a correctable error by rule and therefore those examples don't apply.
...
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Dec 30, 2010, 08:11am
|
|
Replies: 139
Views: 16,926
Not applicable
Nothing you have quoted here is applicable. This is not a throw-in. Those cases don't apply. You can't take one rule that covers one scenario and then use it in a different scenario. We have...
|
Forum: Basketball
Wed Dec 29, 2010, 11:10pm
|
|
Replies: 139
Views: 16,926
Sometimes "they" do
I too have never done this :), but I've heard of officials whistling a foul but then realizing its not a foul and converting it to an inadvertent whistle. Of course, I've never done that either! :)....
|
Forum: Basketball
Wed Dec 29, 2010, 11:05pm
|
|
Replies: 139
Views: 16,926
Taking it out of context
You are assuming that I am using 2.10 to fix this. I'm not. I agree it's not a correctable error. However, the T should not have been assessed. In this case the official did set aside a rule...
|
Forum: Basketball
Wed Dec 29, 2010, 09:31pm
|
|
Replies: 139
Views: 16,926
|
Forum: Basketball
Fri Dec 17, 2010, 02:56pm
|
|
Replies: 14
Views: 2,624
I could see a double T
Your post said that V2 and H2 were pulled out of the area by players from their respective teams. This seems to indicate to me that V2 may have retaliated. Now, I agree from your description that...
|
Forum: Basketball
Fri Dec 17, 2010, 12:20pm
|
|
Replies: 70
Views: 8,685
Not only that....
But he also says "he had it taken away from him", meaning the game he loves. It was taken from him. He threw it away!
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Dec 09, 2010, 08:46am
|
|
Replies: 31
Views: 7,011
Not banned in GA as far as I know
We in GA haven't heard of this. Well, at least no one in my association has informed me of this shoe being banned. I'll have to look into it.
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Dec 07, 2010, 01:39pm
|
|
Replies: 52
Views: 7,184
No
B2 is moving around the screen of A2. A3 sets a screen right in the path of B2. B2 sees him but is not given enough time or distance to stop. A3 is stationary when the contact occurs, but because...
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Dec 07, 2010, 01:31pm
|
|
Replies: 52
Views: 7,184
Yes I agree with that. I never said it was...
Yes I agree with that. I never said it was sacrosanct. Just that time and distance does not apply to just a moving screener, but a stationary one as well. True he was moving to get to the spot but...
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Dec 07, 2010, 01:27pm
|
|
Replies: 52
Views: 7,184
|