![]() |
|
|||
|
There's rules support for that, because catch & recovery are defined in terms of control of the ball, and how can someone be said to have control unless it's exclusive? The argument against that would be the argument against superfluity, i.e. that the rules wouldn't have all the verbiage about simultaneous catch or recovery if it didn't exist.
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Joint possession | Forksref | Football | 16 | Sun Oct 09, 2005 08:47am |
| Joint Possession | waltjp | Football | 1 | Thu Jul 28, 2005 06:52am |
| STC on simultaneous possession Q | kentref | Football | 6 | Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:17pm |
| joint possession on a pass | db | Football | 20 | Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:47pm |
| Joint Possession of Punt in EZ | bjudge | Football | 4 | Fri Oct 08, 2004 02:49pm |