View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 30, 2014, 05:12pm
Robert Goodman Robert Goodman is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by bisonlj View Post
There are many in NCAA who believe there is no such thing as a simultaneous catch.
There's rules support for that, because catch & recovery are defined in terms of control of the ball, and how can someone be said to have control unless it's exclusive? The argument against that would be the argument against superfluity, i.e. that the rules wouldn't have all the verbiage about simultaneous catch or recovery if it didn't exist.
Reply With Quote