Referee moving defenders

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Rich

Unfortunately, I had a HS varsity coach believe this was a rule on Friday night. Sigh.

We had a coach on Friday think that any contact with the snapper was illegal. Or that the snapper could keep his head down and he was given protection. Just another day and another dollar I guess.

Peace

[Canned Heat]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

We had a coach on Friday think that any contact with the snapper was illegal. Or that the snapper could keep his head down and he was given protection. Just another day and another dollar I guess.

Peace

Speaking of which....if I had a dollar for every time I heard "they hit our center"....I'd literally be sitting with an umbrella laden cocktail on a beach.

[zm1283]

I think this had more to do with too many players lining up on one side of the center than a player actually being on the center. I saw this flagged a couple weeks ago in an NFL game. The defense had about seven players on the offense's right side during a FG try. I didn't know that rule but that's how the announcer's explained it. They could be very wrong of course.

[APG]

Originally Posted by zm1283

I think this had more to do with too many players lining up on one side of the center than a player actually being on the center. I saw this flagged a couple weeks ago in an NFL game. The defense had about seven players on the offense's right side during a FG try. I didn't know that rule but that's how the announcer's explained it. They could be very wrong of course.

That is a new rule in the NFL this year...no more than 6 players on either side of the snapper at the snap when the offense presents a field goal or try-kick formation.

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by APG

That is a new rule in the NFL this year...no more than 6 players on either side of the snapper at the snap when the offense presents a field goal or try-kick formation.

That's very interesting, depending on how (if at all) FG formation is defined. Team A could line up unbalanced, but team B can't match?

[jTheUmp]

Originally Posted by NFL Rulebook

Article 3:
During a punt, a field goal attempt, or a Try Kick, a Team B player, who is within one yard of the line of scrimmage at the snap, must have his entire body outside the snapper’s shoulder pads

Note: This restriction does not apply if a team does not present an apparent punt, field goal, or Try Kick formation, or if, after the offensive team has assumed a set position, there is a shift, or a player goes in motion.

Penalty: For illegal formation by the defense: Loss of five yards
from the previous spot.

So, there you go... if they line up in an 'unbalanced formation' as you suggest, the restriction is not in effect.

[APG]

Originally Posted by Robert Goodman

That's very interesting, depending on how (if at all) FG formation is defined. Team A could line up unbalanced, but team B can't match?

From the rule book:

Note: These restrictions do not apply if a team does not present a standard punt, field goal, or Try Kick formation (an equal number of players on the line of scrimmage on either side of the snapper in a tight formation), or if, after the offensive team has assumed a set position, there is a shift, or a player goes in motion.

*Restrictions referring to lining up over the snapper and more than 6 on either side

**Just want to note that jTheUmp's quote is from last year's rule book