Punt question - The Official Forum

#14 (permalink)

Tue Jul 09, 2013, 04:30pm

JRutledge

Do not give a damn!!

Join Date: Jun 2000

Location: On the border

Posts: 30,584

Quote:

Originally Posted by CT1

Same principle. Would have the ball touched R15 without K50's impetus?

Does the rulebook use the term "impetus?"

If not then that is a stretch. I am sure I will discuss this situation with others as a way to see what they think, but I doubt seriously they will simply agree with your assessement of this play. It is one thing to bat the ball towards someone on purpose and to be hit as a result of being near the ball when you should not be.

Peace

__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Punt Question	bossman72	Football	7	Sat Aug 16, 2008 07:47am
Punt Question	New AZ Ref	Football	6	Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:56am
Punt question	MOFFICIAL	Football	2	Sun Oct 03, 2004 10:35am
Punt Question	jwaz	Football	8	Tue Oct 21, 2003 04:06pm
Question re: punt	FBFAN	Football	1	Tue Oct 07, 2003 09:06am

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18am.