The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 3.00 average. Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 28, 2003, 01:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 379
Question

Gentlemen-

Are you confusing the ENZ with the Free Blocking Zone here?
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 28, 2003, 02:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 489
Post NFL rule for what its worth...

Checked out NFL rule 9-1-17(exception 2): "If the receiving team commits a foul after the ball is kicked (ball crosses the scrimmage line) during a scrimmage down and the receivers possess and keep the kicked ball, the penalty for their infraction will be ruled as a foul after possession (post-possession)..."

So fouls by R prior to the kick crossing the neutral zone are treated like loose ball fouls. Fouls by R after the kick has crossed the expanded neutral zone come under PSK if the other requirements are met.

This would also cover double fouls and whether R can decline K's foul and still retain possession of the ball after PSK enforcement of R's foul.

Okay, I'm comfortable with this but is it legal for NF? Is the NF interpretation posted anywhere yet?



__________________
Mike Simonds
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 29, 2003, 01:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 465
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ed Hickland
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by bluduc

What is ENZ?
The expanded neutral zone is the 6 x 8 area that appears magically with the snap of the ball for blocking purposes. Blocking below the waist and now blocking in the back are allowed in this zone. NCAA does not need this zone. Also, except for the PSK, the expanded neutral zone disintegrates once the ball leaves the zone.

[B][QUOTE]
Ed,
you made a boo-boo
What you've described is not the ENZ (expanded neutral zone). What you are describing is the FBZ (free blocking zone). Big differance I know you know. The NZ is the space between the two scrimmage lines during a scrimmage down and is as wide as the length of the ball. The neutral zone may be expanded following the snap up to a maximum of 2 yards behind the defensive line of scrimmage, in the field of play during a scrimmage down. (Remember the ENZ doesn't extend into the EZ)

Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 29, 2003, 09:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,130
[QUOTE]Originally posted by James Neil
[B][QUOTE]Originally posted by Ed Hickland
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by bluduc

What is ENZ?
The expanded neutral zone is the 6 x 8 area that appears magically with the snap of the ball for blocking purposes. Blocking below the waist and now blocking in the back are allowed in this zone. NCAA does not need this zone. Also, except for the PSK, the expanded neutral zone disintegrates once the ball leaves the zone.

Quote:
Ed,
you made a boo-boo
What you've described is not the ENZ (expanded neutral zone). What you are describing is the FBZ (free blocking zone). Big differance I know you know. The NZ is the space between the two scrimmage lines during a scrimmage down and is as wide as the length of the ball. The neutral zone may be expanded following the snap up to a maximum of 2 yards behind the defensive line of scrimmage, in the field of play during a scrimmage down. (Remember the ENZ doesn't extend into the EZ)
You are right. I stand corrected.
__________________
Ed Hickland, MBA, CCP
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 30, 2003, 02:48pm
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
2003 NFHS Rules Interpretations

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mike Simonds
Checked out NFL rule 9-1-17(exception 2): "If the receiving team commits a foul after the ball is kicked (ball crosses the scrimmage line) during a scrimmage down and the receivers possess and keep the kicked ball, the penalty for their infraction will be ruled as a foul after possession (post-possession)..."

So fouls by R prior to the kick crossing the neutral zone are treated like loose ball fouls. Fouls by R after the kick has crossed the expanded neutral zone come under PSK if the other requirements are met.

This would also cover double fouls and whether R can decline K's foul and still retain possession of the ball after PSK enforcement of R's foul.

Okay, I'm comfortable with this but is it legal for NF?
[QUOTE]
Yes, the result of the play is the same under 2003 NFHS Rules, as long as all the conditions of NFHS PSK requirments are met!

[QUOTE]
Is the NF interpretation posted anywhere yet?
[QUOTE]

I just spoke with "Kim" at the NFHS office. Kim said the 2003 interpretations will be posted on their website by the end of this week. You should be able to view them at:

http://www.nfhs.org/sports/football_interp.htm

__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 30, 2003, 05:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 489
Thumbs up Thanks KWH

Okay, I'm looking forward to getting the interpretations. Makes sense to me: on a scrimmage kick possession changes when the kick crosses the expanded neutral zone. Just for fun I posted my own play example on the NF discussion board. There is still disagreement out there so the interpretation will be much welcome.
__________________
Mike Simonds
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1