The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
It is still a foul and should be penalized. The TD should not have stood.
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz!
Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:14am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
It is still a foul and should be penalized. The TD should not have stood.
Aaaaaaaah, no it is not. If you are being held, you are prevented from going somewhere or some movement. This is the equivalent to calling a holding call on a player that either makes the tackle or the defense loses yards in the backfield on a play up the middle. For one it is very suspect by all accounts on the video and the defender beat the blocker despite any attempt to stop him from the ball carrier. Again, this would be a rookie call, not a call from an experienced official.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
I think JRut is being a little to passe about this one. It was a take-down at the point of attack by a blocker who was beat. It's hard to judge if the take down prevented the defender from making a play any sooner and preventing the "pass" from being made though. This one is tough. This is also a tough one to get. The R will be focused on the QB and the U's keys are spread out so he may or may not get a good look at this. Hard to say if someone saw this and passed on it or if nobody saw it.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:33am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
It's easier to see the jersey grab in the replay (the second time they show the play), I'll grant that.

What bigjohn doesn't seem to grasp is that it's not simply a matter of seeing a jersey grab and throwing a flag. First of all, who's (in a 5-man crew) going to see this?

Furthermore, it's a split-second judgment in deciding if the grab/restrict affected the play. And that's not a clear-cut decision, either. Although I'm leaning towards what bisonlj said in his post above mine.

So much easier officiating from the sidelines, or so we're told every week.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:36am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
So much easier officiating from the sidelines, or so we're told every week.
Almost as easy as officiating from Bristol, CT.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 06:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
#70 reaches out and grabs the jersey up near the left shoulder of the defender, spins him, and takes him down.
After the word, jersey, you are 100% wrong. The defender was not restricted, and was going down anyway.

At this point in the game, you have to MAKE IT BIG, or ignore it. Call that on my crew and you won't be working in the playoffs with us.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 13, 2012, 12:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 762
A hold is one where EVERYONE agrees it's a hold. It's those that cause your jaw to drop on what a player does. Did I say it has to be HUGE? If 100 people view a play and 99 think it's a hold. Guess what, it's not. I want my holding calls to have all 100 agree it's a hold. That's how big in needs to be. If you follow that philosophy you will achieve a great deal of consistency in your calls.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 19, 2012, 02:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 39
I have to agree with RadioBlue on this one. It looks to me like #70 pulled the jersey at the shoulder and twisted the defender away from the QB preventing him from making a play. Had I seen it I would have flagged it.

That being said, Bison is correct about who is going to see this one. This is a pretty long play with 22 players spread across the field. The LM, LJ and BJ are all focused on the players downfield and the R has to decide if the QB was down or not. I would be hardpressed to blame anyone if this call were missed.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 22, 2012, 04:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 622
A big time hold that had absolutely no effect on the play. A good no call.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 23, 2012, 12:41pm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdf5 View Post
A big time hold that had absolutely no effect on the play. A good no call.
Not sure I can agree with the statement. Perhaps the blocker could've just stayed with the block and not grabbed the jersey. But he didn't ... and there's probably a reason why he didn't. That hold created space and opportunity. If that gets seen (and 95% of the time it probably doesn't in 5-man), it's gotta get a flag IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:47am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Aaaaaaaah, no it is not. If you are being held, you are prevented from going somewhere or some movement. This is the equivalent to calling a holding call on a player that either makes the tackle or the defense loses yards in the backfield on a play up the middle. For one it is very suspect by all accounts on the video and the defender beat the blocker despite any attempt to stop him from the ball carrier. Again, this would be a rookie call, not a call from an experienced official.

Peace
On second look at the play, I'm not so sure. The defender may have been slowed a bit by the grab. If I see that, I would likely flag it.

Problem is, as a white hat I'm probably not going to see it - I got a QB being pressured by another defender and I have to rule on the pass. And the umpire may not get it, either -- and from his angle, it's probably not going to look like anything.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:53am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
On second look at the play, I'm not so sure. The defender may have been slowed a bit by the grab. If I see that, I would likely flag it.

Problem is, as a white hat I'm probably not going to see it - I got a QB being pressured by another defender and I have to rule on the pass. And the umpire may not get it, either -- and from his angle, it's probably not going to look like anything.
I saw the replay and there are like 3 or 4 players all near the ball. The defender does go around the blocker and runs into another player. That is why I am not calling a hold here and it does not seem like he was prevented from getting to the ball simply on the "grab" attempt alone. There is a reason we say "MIBT" and that was clearly not "there." I certainly see an attempt at a grab, but not an actual clear grab, not with several players around the ball.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 12:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 68
Did anyone notice the Referee (White Hate) going to the wrong side of a right handed QB?

If he is on the correct side does he get a better look at the hold (or not a hold)?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 12:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 68
I would have to call a hold on the play...the defender #70 Holds would have made the tackle before the other defensive player hits the QB.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2012, 12:23pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBaldGuy View Post
Did anyone notice the Referee (White Hate) going to the wrong side of a right handed QB?

If he is on the correct side does he get a better look at the hold (or not a hold)?
Is it clear that this is a right handed QB? After all he does flip the ball in the air unorthodox on this play.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Holding/No Holding on Play w/ Fumble kd0254 Football 8 Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:41am
holding call stegenref Football 4 Thu Oct 15, 2009 07:21pm
basic question (sorry) about spot of ball post holding call... nmayhew Football 3 Mon Jan 12, 2009 09:05am
holding vs intentional foul call ? OHBBREF Basketball 6 Tue Mar 27, 2007 04:54pm
(NCAA) Holding or not holding? voiceoflg Football 12 Sun Sep 24, 2006 08:59pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1