|
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 03:31pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rocky, I think that is reasonable.
In the OP, if it's clear that the receiver is on his route and not a potential blocker, then I'll drop a flag for illegal use of the hands. IBB should be judged using advantage and defensive IBB is rarely going to gain them an advantage. That doesn't mean a PF can't be a consideration.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers Last edited by Welpe; Fri Sep 14, 2012 at 03:35pm. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No Longer a Potential Blocker | Ed Hickland | Football | 64 | Sat May 25, 2013 03:29pm |
| Potential blocker or not? | Illini_Ref | Football | 17 | Sun Sep 04, 2011 11:13am |
| Illegal sub or partic. on the Receivers | BoBo | Football | 15 | Mon Oct 24, 2005 09:35am |
| Elgible Receivers | Snappenhaggle | Football | 8 | Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:16am |
| Question on hitting player already OB | chuck chopper | Football | 18 | Sat Jan 17, 2004 05:19pm |
Threaded Mode
