The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 14, 2012, 08:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
this is from a fan site but a situation that is often not handled correctly.



We all know there is no chuck rule in NFHS and I say any contact on a receiver like this falls under IUH on an eligible receiver. at the very least, many of these BLOCKS should be called BIB and this one possibly UR, don't you think?
I cannot envision a situation (of any kind) where I could call blocking in the back on the defense unless there was a turnover.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No Longer a Potential Blocker Ed Hickland Football 64 Sat May 25, 2013 03:29pm
Potential blocker or not? Illini_Ref Football 17 Sun Sep 04, 2011 11:13am
Illegal sub or partic. on the Receivers BoBo Football 15 Mon Oct 24, 2005 09:35am
Elgible Receivers Snappenhaggle Football 8 Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:16am
Question on hitting player already OB chuck chopper Football 18 Sat Jan 17, 2004 05:19pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1