![]() |
|
|||
Fed 7-5 "additional" yards
In case of intentional PI, is the "penalized an additional 15 yards" added to the distance of a single penalty, i.e. made a 30 yd. penalty? Or is it administered as 2 penalties, each of 15 yds., in succession?
|
|
|||
What does it really matter ? 30 = 15 + 15 = 30.
You stand a better chance of being struck by lightning inside your house than ever seeing it on the field. There is no mechanic which specifies but since S27 is for USC/Non contact foul one can infer that the R would signal PI, U walk off 15, then signal USC and walk off 15. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Football Fundamentals state that all penalties are 5, 10 or 15 yards -- there is no 30 yard penalty. So, the term "in addition" must mean that the team is penalized 15 yards for the PI, and 15 yards for the intent. |
|
|||
Quote:
Consider: ball at B45, pass play, DPI + intent. A 30 yard penalty would be enforced half the distance, A 1/10 @ B22.5. If anyone in the history of high school football were ever to call this in an actual game: ball at B45, DPI + intent. Enforce DPI to the B30, then another 15 for intent, A 1/10 @ B15. That said, the question is ridiculous. The foul is never called, and it's a fundamental (as CT1 points out) that penalties are 5, 10, or 15 yards.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
I have never called this and doubt I ever will, but I could see this being called in a game if a coach coaches this kind of action. I do not see this as the equivalent of the multiple foul in basketball.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Say the foul happened on the 32. A single 30-yard penalty (which doesn't exist, btw) would result in a half-the-distance walkoff to the 16. Two 15 yarders (the right way to do this) results in a first walk to the 17, and a second walk to the 8 1/2.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
So what in my statement is wrong? I realize based on field position that it is conceivable that one or both penalty assessments may or may not receive the entire 15 yard penalty mark-off.
I saw no need to type an entire list of where and when it would become necessary to satisfy his wacky scenario. Kind of like the etrade baby commercial- he's more likely to be mauled by a polar bear and a regular bear in the same day. |
|
|||
We had a case last year where a B player hit the QB late for RTP, then got a taunting USC as the intercepted pass was being returned for a soon-to-be nullified touchdown. (Goose-stepping with the ball held out to the pursuing A players as he crossed the goal line.)
We took 6 off the board, walked off two separate 15's, set the stakes and kept playing. The only thing more eerie than the chorus of boos and angry shouts from the visitor stands was the momentary silence when everyone looked at our WH when he began the signals. I felt really vulnerable holding a down indicator with no kevlar under my shirt. |
|
|||
Robert said:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
If Fed wanted to be clear, they would've said either that it's a 30 yard penalty in the case of intentional PI, or that it's successive 2 penalties of 15 yds. each, the second being a succeeding spot enforcement, rather than writing this "additional 15 yards" business. It's not clear whether "additional" means you add the yards to a single penalty or administer a 2nd penalty. Last edited by Robert Goodman; Tue Sep 04, 2012 at 07:20pm. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology | Duffman | Basketball | 17 | Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm |
Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
Why "general" and "additional"? | Back In The Saddle | Basketball | 1 | Sat Oct 07, 2006 02:56pm |