![]() |
|
|
|||
Fed 7-5 "additional" yards
In case of intentional PI, is the "penalized an additional 15 yards" added to the distance of a single penalty, i.e. made a 30 yd. penalty? Or is it administered as 2 penalties, each of 15 yds., in succession?
|
|
|||
What does it really matter ? 30 = 15 + 15 = 30.
You stand a better chance of being struck by lightning inside your house than ever seeing it on the field. There is no mechanic which specifies but since S27 is for USC/Non contact foul one can infer that the R would signal PI, U walk off 15, then signal USC and walk off 15. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Football Fundamentals state that all penalties are 5, 10 or 15 yards -- there is no 30 yard penalty. So, the term "in addition" must mean that the team is penalized 15 yards for the PI, and 15 yards for the intent. |
|
|||
Quote:
If Fed wanted to be clear, they would've said either that it's a 30 yard penalty in the case of intentional PI, or that it's successive 2 penalties of 15 yds. each, the second being a succeeding spot enforcement, rather than writing this "additional 15 yards" business. It's not clear whether "additional" means you add the yards to a single penalty or administer a 2nd penalty. Last edited by Robert Goodman; Tue Sep 04, 2012 at 07:20pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
Well, it is to everyone but you.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
PENALTY: Illegal forward pass (Arts. 2a,b,c) – (S35); intentional grounding
(Arts. 2d,e) –(S36) – 5 yards plus loss of down – (S9). Pass interference (Art. 10) – (S33) – 15 yards and automatic first down if by B, 15 yards plus loss of down if by A – (S9). If the pass interference by either player is intentional, his team shall be penalized an additional 15 yards (S27). Ineligible downfield (Art. 12) – (S37) – 5 yards. Illegal touching (Art. 13) – (S16) – 5 yards plus loss of down. I have seen an A players commit OPI intentionally to prevent an interception. No one even thinks about that being an additional 15 yard PENALTY!
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz! Bobby Knight |
|
|||
We had a case last year where a B player hit the QB late for RTP, then got a taunting USC as the intercepted pass was being returned for a soon-to-be nullified touchdown. (Goose-stepping with the ball held out to the pursuing A players as he crossed the goal line.)
We took 6 off the board, walked off two separate 15's, set the stakes and kept playing. The only thing more eerie than the chorus of boos and angry shouts from the visitor stands was the momentary silence when everyone looked at our WH when he began the signals. I felt really vulnerable holding a down indicator with no kevlar under my shirt. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology | Duffman | Basketball | 17 | Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm |
Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
Why "general" and "additional"? | Back In The Saddle | Basketball | 1 | Sat Oct 07, 2006 02:56pm |