![]() |
|
|
|||
If the snap doesn't happen immediately it is an illegal snap. Blow it dead and walk off 5 yards on the offense.
There are no restrictions once the ball moves. I just don't think anywhere, anytime, anyplace, can a B player hit the ball before it gets snapped unless it was an illegal snap or the B player encroached. To me that is the only way this situation should play out.
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz! Bobby Knight |
|
|||
Quote:
NCAA & Fed use the same words (unsurprising, considering they got them from the same rules committee before they existed as organiz'ns) to describe the requirements of the snap, including the word "quick". So if it were interpreted your way, how could NCAA have a provision penalizing B's interference with the snap at AR 7-1-5 II (or whatever it is now)? It would always have to be a foul by A, as the scenario described by this ruling would be impossible. Also, do you think the Federation is unaware of this NCAA ruling (which apparently hinges on the meaning of "is snapped"), and have just decided it's unnecessary and is implicit in their own rules wording? The one thing I'll agree is that the rules makers, when long ago they required the snap to be quick and to leave the snapper's hands, intended to minimize the possibility of situations like that described. However, I think all concerned realized that the snap could never be instantaneous and that although such occurrences could be minimized they could never be eliminated. To me it's clear that NCAA has now decided that if a snap is not completed due to the action of either team, they won't allow a scrimmage play and will penalize the team at fault, but that other governing bodies continue to put the entire onus on team A and are willing to let team B benefit by whatever they can do to disrupt the start of the play or by whatever mess team A makes of an attempted snap. Last edited by Robert Goodman; Fri Oct 14, 2011 at 12:31pm. |
|
|||
Your words
Then why is it illegal for the defense to take a swipe at it?
You're talking out of both sides of your a$$, BJ.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Slapping the Snap | bigjohn | Football | 82 | Sun Oct 26, 2008 02:44pm |
Slapping The Backboard | kerry7 | Basketball | 17 | Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:25am |
Judgment calls on pre-snap and at-the-snap fouls??? | ChickenOfNC | Football | 18 | Tue Jan 09, 2007 01:44pm |
slapping of the backboard | timharris | Basketball | 2 | Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:09pm |
Slapping the Backboard | rpirtle | Basketball | 22 | Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:16am |