![]() |
|
|
|||
Who: Team and Number (If you can't get me a number then you didn't see enough of the play to throw a flag)
What: Foul (including distance penalty) When: Before the pass, after the play, etc. Where: Where did the foul happen and where is our enforcement spot. Finally what is the clock status? |
|
|||
Gimme the number of the kid that fouled last. It doesn't help me start the enforcement process in my head, whereas all the other info does.
Make sure you (or someone) tells me the result of the play. If I'm doing my job of watching the kicker or passer, I'll likely have no clue it was intercepted, incomplete, touched by R and recovered by K, etc etc. Nothing hacks off a white hat more than his crew letting him give options and signals for an accepted penalty and only then does someone pipe up and say "Won't they want to decline that and keep the interception?" You don't necessarily have to have thrown a flag to be in the conversation. You may have seen the ball tipped at the line so there is no Pass Int foul after all. You may be drawing my attention to the fact that time expired, so the Offensive captain may prefer to take the offside and an untimed down rather than the yards they made.
__________________
Sorry Death, you lose.... It was Professor Plum! |
|
|||
Quote:
We worry too much about what coaches think. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
But I do firmly believe that if an official can't tell me who was holding, blocked in the back, or committed pass interference, that he may have guessed he saw a foul based on seeing half a play, the coaches or fans reactions, or his own anticipation. You tell me why an official should be excused from getting a number? I've never heard an official with a mic say, "Holding, someone on white, 10 yards," because officials as you move up the ladder, get numbers. I want my crew to get numbers. |
|
|||
Quote:
Comparing us to NCAA or pros is not valid - especially NFL. They have FAR fewer teams and numbers to deal with, and often not only know the number of the players but the names as well - BEFORE the game starts. If I get the same team twice in a season, it's a rarity.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Are we responsible for getting a number? Yes. But you cannot conclude that a lack of number means the official does not have a foul. Last edited by wwcfoa43; Thu Sep 16, 2010 at 02:40pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
If you are trying to suggest the pros do those things, they have 7 officials and get to stay on a key for several seconds on a play. In a 5 man or fewer crew that is not always as easy. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
As mentioned earlier 99% of the time it's not a problem to get the number. And I do believe it is good officiating strive to get the number every time. But it's not critical to the game. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
One size NEVER fits all, and if you're looking for absolutes and "silver bullets", football is a bad place to be looking. Perhaps the closest thing to really consistant is the lurking presence of the unexpected.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
enforcement, penalties, white hat |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reporting Subs | Chess Ref | Softball | 6 | Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:24pm |
Reporting after horn | sseltser | Basketball | 3 | Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:25pm |
Reporting Box | Johnny Ringo | Basketball | 7 | Thu Jan 11, 2007 03:11am |
Two-Hand Reporting | JCurrie | Basketball | 4 | Wed Dec 21, 2005 01:31pm |
Reporting | Mike Burns | Basketball | 3 | Wed Feb 13, 2002 12:30am |