Ariz/GB fumble

[jimpiano]

Originally Posted by pedr

I also thought - both in real time and then watching replays - that Rodgers kicked the ball.

What I really don't understand is why he did it. If he hadn't, the ball would almost certainly have hit the ground, and every time I saw it I've got forward pass, not fumble there. His hand was moving forwards in a passing motion when the defender pushed at the ball, diverting its path. If Rodgers lets the ball hit the ground it is (or at least should be) 4th down, and a chance to be brave and go for it, or punt away and hope for a (miraculous) stop by the Packers D. Kicking the ball seemed to have no purpose, and could have had no purpose, particularly as it's not really something he's ever trained to do!

Then why were the officials throwing their bags?

[JasonTX]

Originally Posted by jimpiano

Then why were the officials throwing their bags?

In these bang-bang plays like this I believe the officials are supposed to go with fumble and then let replay kick in to see if it was a pass.