The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 01:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 280
Fumble ?

A 1 and Goal - fumbles ball into end zone where B in a scrumb bats it out of the endzone accidentally. I've got a touchback - yes or no?
__________________
Refsmitty
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 02:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 14
A's force of the fumble actually put the ball into the endzone. Touchback
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 02:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 265
The result of the play would be a touchback since A's fumble was the force that put the ball in the endzone. However, did B muff the fumble out of the endzone, or did he illegally bat it out? If you judge that he illegally batted it, the penalty would be assessed half the distance to the goal from the end of the run or previous spot (depending on where the fumble occured) and replay the down.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 02:33pm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patton View Post
(depending on where the fumble occured)
The only place the fumble could have occured was in the field of play, right? (Otherwise it would be a TD.) Half-the-distance is the only option ... or am I missing something?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 02:43pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioBlue View Post
The only place the fumble could have occured was in the field of play, right? (Otherwise it would be a TD.) Half-the-distance is the only option ... or am I missing something?
Maybe it was outside of the 30...that'd be one heck of a fumble though.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 02:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 622
You can't "accidentally bat" a ball. A bat is an intentional act.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 02:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioBlue View Post
The only place the fumble could have occured was in the field of play, right? (Otherwise it would be a TD.) Half-the-distance is the only option ... or am I missing something?
If it was 1/10 from the B8 and they ran to the B4 where it was fumbled into the EZ, we would enforce from the B4. If it was 1/10 from the B1 and the snap was muffed or A33 fumbled the ball from behind the NZ and it went forward into the EZ, we would enforce for the previous spot.

Last edited by Patton; Fri Oct 09, 2009 at 03:06pm.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 02:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioBlue View Post
The only place the fumble could have occured was in the field of play, right? (Otherwise it would be a TD.) Half-the-distance is the only option ... or am I missing something?
"depending on where the fumble occured" refers to whether you will enforce from the end of the run (if fumble was beyond LOS), or previous spot (if fumble occured behind LOS).
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 02:55pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Keep it simple. Force only applies to the ball being put into the end zone which in this case was the fumble. After the ball is in the end zone, no new force can apply. A simple attempt to recover the ball is not illegal or changes the status of the ball that was already in the end zone.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 02:58pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patton View Post
If it was 1/10 from the B8 and they ran to the B4 where it was fumbled into the EZ, we would enforce from the B4. If it was 1/10 from the B1 and the snap was muffed or A33 fumbled the ball from behind the NZ and it went forward into the EZ, we would enforce for the previous spot.
Enforce what?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 03:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Keep it simple. Force only applies to the ball being put into the end zone which in this case was the fumble. After the ball is in the end zone, no new force can apply. A simple attempt to recover the ball is not illegal or changes the status of the ball that was already in the end zone.
Agreed, but a foul during the down can certainly change the final outcome of the play. I'm not sure if the "keep it simple" was directed at me or RefSmitty. My intent was to highlight the use of the word bat, which is an intentional act and illegal, in comparison to muff and the difference it could make on this play.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 09, 2009, 03:13pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patton View Post
Agreed, but a foul during the down can certainly change the final outcome of the play. I'm not sure if the "keep it simple" was directed at me or RefSmitty. My intent was to highlight the use of the word bat, which is an intentional act and illegal, in comparison to muff and the difference it could make on this play.
Actually keep it simple was not directed at anyone. It was to say that what a force is by definition. What happens in the end zone does not apply or change the force. I am not talking about penalties and penalties have nothing to do with force. A penalty is a separate issue and will be enforced base on what kind of foul it is and where and when it took place.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fumble... RushmoreRef Basketball 2 Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:23am
fumble yankeesfan Football 9 Mon Nov 06, 2006 09:51am
IW on GL Fumble. GBFBUmp Football 4 Fri Oct 13, 2006 03:03pm
Fumble in mid air cford Basketball 3 Tue Jul 06, 2004 08:56pm
Fumble-Dribble-Fumble doghead Basketball 5 Sat Oct 14, 2000 02:24pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1