The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 03, 2009, 02:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by red View Post
Is delay of game a declinable penalty?

Fourth down and Team A is in punt formation on Team B's 40 yard line. Team A is fouled for delay of game. Penalty declined - Team B ball on their own 40.
AFAIK it's only in the NFL that such a penalty can't (or at least for a while couldn't) be declined, because of just such a situation as that, where a deadlock could occur, because team A wants to move back 5 yards and team B won't let them. That didn't use to happen before 1974, because team A would usually attempt a field goal. Starting in 1974, it became too risky to try many long field goals, because team R could just let the ball become dead on a miss and get the ball at the previous spot, rather than usually a touchback's being produced. Plus, the goals being moved to the end line, field position that had been fairly good for a shot at goal became iffy or worse. However, punters like Ray Guy weren't good at anything but getting maximum distance, so many teams in the NFL started giving deliberate dead ball fouls in punting situations to avoid a likely touchback.

Delay of game was favored over other dead ball fouls because there was always the chance of drawing B offside, and benefiting in an in-between distance situation, by making them wait on the line a long time. However, sometimes a long count was combined with legal shifting and questionable false starts that might result either in a penalty on team A (good for them) or on B (also good for A). But then team B started declining the penalties, and then what would happen if team A still wanted to go back 5 and just committed blatant false starts? Or just sent half the coverage team 30 yards offside before snapping? USC? Forfeit?

So, at least for a time, they made dead ball fouls automatic enforcements. I think they might've changed since then to put the onus on team A, not sure. Something was done to address the possibility of team B's returning the "favor" by themselves committing a dead ball 5 yarder before the ball could be put in play, which I actually saw happen once. But the main thing is that punting teams in the NFL eventually improved at making the ball dead by one means or another inside the opponent's 20 without the need to back themselves up.

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 04, 2009, 07:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
AFAIK it's only in the NFL that such a penalty can't (or at least for a while couldn't) be declined, because of just such a situation as that, where a deadlock could occur, because team A wants to move back 5 yards and team B won't let them. That didn't use to happen before 1974, because team A would usually attempt a field goal. Starting in 1974, it became too risky to try many long field goals, because team R could just let the ball become dead on a miss and get the ball at the previous spot, rather than usually a touchback's being produced. Plus, the goals being moved to the end line, field position that had been fairly good for a shot at goal became iffy or worse. However, punters like Ray Guy weren't good at anything but getting maximum distance, so many teams in the NFL started giving deliberate dead ball fouls in punting situations to avoid a likely touchback.

Delay of game was favored over other dead ball fouls because there was always the chance of drawing B offside, and benefiting in an in-between distance situation, by making them wait on the line a long time. However, sometimes a long count was combined with legal shifting and questionable false starts that might result either in a penalty on team A (good for them) or on B (also good for A). But then team B started declining the penalties, and then what would happen if team A still wanted to go back 5 and just committed blatant false starts? Or just sent half the coverage team 30 yards offside before snapping? USC? Forfeit?

So, at least for a time, they made dead ball fouls automatic enforcements. I think they might've changed since then to put the onus on team A, not sure. Something was done to address the possibility of team B's returning the "favor" by themselves committing a dead ball 5 yarder before the ball could be put in play, which I actually saw happen once. But the main thing is that punting teams in the NFL eventually improved at making the ball dead by one means or another inside the opponent's 20 without the need to back themselves up.

Robert
Thank you Robert, I just wanted to know what time it is.
__________________
Ed Hickland, MBA, CCP
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Twenty technicals in one game - all for delay of game! Mark Padgett Basketball 14 Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:55pm
T or Delay of Game? JohnBark Basketball 3 Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:59pm
Game delay yellowjacket73 Basketball 14 Wed Jan 14, 2004 11:49am
Delay of Game?? Rev.Ref63 Basketball 20 Sat Jan 12, 2002 01:46pm
Delay of game Mike Burns Basketball 6 Mon Sep 10, 2001 11:37am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1