Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon Kincer
He shouldalways leave it up to the calling official as to wether the call is upheld or waived off. Wtih that being said, He is also the dispute breaker. They guy who has the final say so should a disagreement arise.
|
Brandon, I can't tell if youre trying to split a hait beyond it's splitting capacity, but if you're still having trouble with the words, read the following rules;
NF: 1.1.4 "The game is administered by
game officials whose title and duties are are stated in the official's manual".
NF: 1.1.6 "The
referee has authority to rule promptly, and in the spirit of good sportsmanship, on any situation not covered in the rules. The
referee's decisions are
final in all matters pertaining to the game.
If a referee's observation and conclusions about a situation are different than another official calling a particular situation, the fereree is within his right to tactfully, discreetly seek details supporting the call. In the vast majority od instances, information from the calling official about his observations will provide the detail necessary to support his reaction.
In those rare instances when that may not be the case, or when a rule is misunderstood and the referee believes has been misapllied, the referee should be able to persuade the calling official of the error of his decision, which should motivate the calling official to change his ruling.
In the unusual circumstance where disagreement persists, the referee would likely secure input from the other game officials to try and back up either position, but the final decision, and responsibility, are the referee's to make.
It should be highly unusual, however, to reach the point of requiring a non consensus decision.