![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Jim D-
You continue to answer the question with a question. Unfortunatly however, you failed to list the correct answer in your multiple choice question as his status is not out of bounds. Therefore, the play is legal as he did not violate any of these rules: 2-29-1, 2-37, 9-6-1, 9-6-2 and 9-6-3 Have a great day!!!
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
It sounds like you picked door number 3 - A third state not mentioned in the rule book (in this case "Not out of bounds"). That's all I was asking. Have a good weekend. Srimmages start around he tomorrow. |
|
|||
|
My point is our charter is to determine if the play is legal.
And, since the player involved was "not out of bounds by rule", the play has to be legal. Determining the status of the player is NOT required for officials to make a ruling, and, is therefore, irrelvant. We only have to determine if any rules were broken and, as much as EVERYBODY on this thread wants this play to be illegal, for now, it remains legal! Enjoy your scrimmages.
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
|
|
|||
|
There is a beast in logic called a "false dilemma." Here's the general example:
It is either A or B. It is not A, therefore it must be B. To rephrase: A player is either out of bounds or inbounds. He is not out of bounds, therefore he is inbounds. However, there is a third possibility: in the air. A player in the air is simply that, he's in the air. At that moment he is neither inbounds nor out of bounds. Where he lands will determine which he is. (Consider a player leaving his feet inbounds, catching a pass, and landing out of bounds.) The NF could have written the rules so that a player's last status is also his current status if he is in the air: a player who leaves his feet while out of bounds is considered out of bounds until he touches inbounds, and vice versa. They chose not to do so. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| alf rides again, alf's english lesson, illegal participation, reading comprehension 101, totally stupic |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| illegal Substitution or illegal Participation | verticalStripes | Football | 11 | Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:57am |
| Reddings Study Guide | JFlores | Football | 8 | Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:00am |
| Illegal Participation, Illegal Touching, Nothing | BoBo | Football | 13 | Thu Nov 01, 2007 02:09pm |
| Woohoo - Reddings Guide came today | HLin NC | Football | 4 | Fri Jun 01, 2007 07:11am |
| Illegal Formation or Illegal participation? | wgw | Football | 9 | Mon Aug 29, 2005 09:31am |