|
Sat Apr 11, 2009, 04:43pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
The first post in this thread contains the Redding play and interpretation that supports this.
As far as the actual wording of the rule is concerned, I don't know how "touching" can be any simpler and imply anything than the present tense of the verb. With all due respect, it appears you are trying to make the rules fit your interpretation. In regard to the "intent" that you mention in your previous post, you're not alluding to the spirit of the rule are you? 
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers Last edited by Welpe; Sat Apr 11, 2009 at 04:47pm. |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| alf rides again, alf's english lesson, illegal participation, reading comprehension 101, totally stupic |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| illegal Substitution or illegal Participation | verticalStripes | Football | 11 | Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:57am |
| Reddings Study Guide | JFlores | Football | 8 | Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:00am |
| Illegal Participation, Illegal Touching, Nothing | BoBo | Football | 13 | Thu Nov 01, 2007 02:09pm |
| Woohoo - Reddings Guide came today | HLin NC | Football | 4 | Fri Jun 01, 2007 07:11am |
| Illegal Formation or Illegal participation? | wgw | Football | 9 | Mon Aug 29, 2005 09:31am |
Threaded Mode
