The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 23, 2008, 12:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 1,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by PackersFTW View Post
correct. i saw them both move a few seconds before the snap, but one of them set before the snap.
Then that's a shift, not motion.
__________________
"And I'm not just some fan, I've refereed football and basketball in addition to all the baseball I've umpired. I've never made a call that horrible in my life in any sport."---Greatest. Official. Ever.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 23, 2008, 02:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72 View Post
No. This commonly happens when the kicker expects the ball to be snapped and the snapper doesn't snap the ball right away... So the kicker "stutter steps" forward (like Kasay did) in anticipation of the late snap. It's actually a DISadvantage
It's a disadvantage to do it by accident. It would be an advantage to start forward early on purpose if they timed it right. I'm not saying it would be easy, or they would do so routinely in Canadian football, where I haven't seen it, but I still think it's enough of a potential advantage that it should be flagged.

Quote:
But yes, I've seen this happen a couple times in my lifetime where the kicker "stutters" before he starts. I always wondered if this was illegal/forward motion or a false start... but it was never called.
I don't know why officials wouldn't flag a kicker's illegal motion as easily as other cases of a back's unintentionally beating the count. However, if the "stutter" was a step forward, then a step backward, it's not illegal motion because the back was not moving forward when the snap began. It could be seen as simulating the start of play, and several months ago here there was a thread on whether to call a false start when a back accidentally starts early.

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 23, 2008, 03:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
REPLY: Technically, I believe that what Kasay did was a false start, but he certainly put himself at a disadvantage by doing so.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 24, 2008, 05:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSU213 View Post
They both should have reset and then one of them (or another back/end) could have gone in motion after a second--although in the NFL they seem to take liberty with the "one second." I'm not sure exactly how it is written in NFL rules, but it seems guys are often sent for less than a second before a snap, and it is deemed legal.
agreed.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 24, 2008, 05:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 70
no, it was about a full second before the snap, but if you think about it, it only puts him at a disadvantage. it's not like the defense will see him move and jump offsides like they would a lineman. the last thing you said is key.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clarification of what makes a kicker a kicker... sloth Football 9 Mon Jul 02, 2007 09:48am
Roughing the Kicker jlawyer55 Football 5 Sun Oct 23, 2005 05:54pm
Roughing the Kicker New AZ Ref Football 5 Fri Oct 07, 2005 02:19pm
Roughing the kicker Texoma_LJ Football 5 Wed Oct 06, 2004 08:29am
When does a kicker become a runner? Ed Hickland Football 6 Mon Nov 12, 2001 01:08pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1