The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 07, 2005, 12:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 27
Send a message via MSN to New AZ Ref
Question

During last nights JV game, I was working with another Crew's White Hat and we had a discussion about roughing the kicker. The discussion was on a play similar to this:

4th and 25 on A's 40.

A is in scrimmage kick formation and the ball is snapped low. The kicker picks up the ball and starts to run. He gets near the sideline, but still is 10 yds behind the line of scrimmage. The kicker then sets himself and and punts. He is hit after the play and the WH flags it.

My contention is after he sets himself and kicks, he is a kicker and it would be roughing the kicker (you would give the defense more leeway, but roughing is still a possibility.)

The WH contends that once the kicker starts to run, he is a runner and can't have roughing the kicker, that it would be a personal foul for unnecessary roughness.

In this case it would make the difference between A having 1st & 10 and A having 4th and 10.

What is the right call on this?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 07, 2005, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 798
First, we don't have "unnecessary roughness" (NFL) but I know what you mean. I had a similar play last Friday night and left the hankie in the pocket all together. It depends, in part, how he "sets himself." You need to judge the reasonableness of whether a kick can be made. I had the punter scramble and just as he approached the sideline kicked the ball at the last second then was contacted. The coach wanted roughing the kicker and I mentioned that it wasn't reasonable a kick would be made and the assistant agreed and told him as such. But, remember, the player who kicks is now a potential tackler of the return man so be careful about even calling a PF. I guess you gotta see it to say how you would really rule on this.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 07, 2005, 12:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 522
Just for clarity's sake, when he punts the ball, even though he ran some first, he is still a kicker (2-38-8...just so the kick is legal); so if it is ruled a foul, it can be roughing the kicker. If he no longer was a kicker by rule, and the R ruled that what team R did was not necessary (or use you own word here), it would be a personal foul. It is important to make the designation since roughing the kicker is an automatic first down, while the PF is not.

I think for us to offer a clear ruling, we would have to see the play. Unfortunately, we can't really say (or see) what "sets himself" means, and we cannot know if it was 'resonably certain' a kick would be made (as per rule 9-4-5a). I don't mean to give a non-answer answer, but without seeing the play, that is the best I can do.
__________________
If the play is designed to fool someone, make sure you aren't the fool.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 07, 2005, 12:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 104
We had it also Friday night. Team A did a "quick kick" from a non-scrimmage kick formation on 4th down. As the LJ, I was uncertain that they would kick. The referee flagged R for roughing the kicker and I think it was a very questionable call.

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 07, 2005, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally posted by New AZ Ref

My contention is after he sets himself and kicks, he is a kicker and it would be roughing the kicker (you would give the defense more leeway, but roughing is still a possibility.)

The WH contends that once the kicker starts to run, he is a runner and can't have roughing the kicker, that it would be a personal foul for unnecessary roughness.
REPLY: Your contention is correct; your white hat's is not. PSU213's answer is a good summary.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 07, 2005, 02:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
If the punter is running with the ball I'd give him protection similar to that of a QB who passes on the run. If the defense is already committed to making the tackle it's not going to be flagged.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1