Game Clock Rule

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by ajmc

Some argue that multiple signals create redundancy, which although often technically correct, seem more concerned with sacrificing an added level of accuracy for some sense of brevity that offers no benefit whatsoever.

Yeah, what's wrong with redundancy in communication? What's wrong with a little redundancy in communication?

But, to improve synchroniz'n, would you give the ready signal with one arm while giving the wind with the other?

Robert

[JasonTX]

Under UIL in Texas, if the game clock and the play clock are to both start at the same time, then the only signal we are to give is the "winding" signal and both the play clock and game clock will start on that signal.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by JasonTX

Under UIL in Texas, if the game clock and the play clock are to both start at the same time, then the only signal we are to give is the "winding" signal and both the play clock and game clock will start on that signal.

This is what I do. I give either the chop or the wind, but never both.

I never give the wind on the snap, which I see some R's do. I think it's unnecessary.

[JasonTX]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

This is what I do. I give either the chop or the wind, but never both.

I never give the wind on the snap, which I see some R's do. I think it's unnecessary.

I agree.