The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Controversy in Florida Controversy in Florida
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 01, 2008, 09:19pm
Do not give a damn!!
  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by OverAndBack View Post
(I think it was the punter, but no matter.)
I have called that a few times near the goal line if that was the punter. It was a dump play anyway.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 01, 2008, 09:40pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 226
Agree it was a pass - Mat have been IG as well. Can't tell if there was someone out of the frame.
__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 09:27am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Indianola, Ia
Posts: 319
Incomplete as well and yes intentional grounding could be possible
__________________
"Call what you see and see what you call!"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 10:58am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
  
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
IG is likely. It's also clearly a forward pass, although I could see the referee get screened at the last second here.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 10:58am
MRH MRH is offline
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 61
Incomplete pass.

Based on the view of the video I would rule IG. With the loss of down provision (assuming it was 4th down) R takes possession just outside the goal line.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 01:19pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Incomplete pass. Regarding IG, it looks like 45 might be an intended target. Hard to tell, though.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 01:25pm
Do not give a damn!!
  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Well that is if you decide that the attempt to get rid of the pass was not purposely to save a loss. I really do not think he was trying to complete a pass. At least he wasn't with that motion.
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 07:14pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
  
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Well that is if you decide that the attempt to get rid of the pass was not purposely to save a loss. I really do not think he was trying to complete a pass. At least he wasn't with that motion.
Me either. Ruling correctly here would've delayed a touchdown by one play (likely).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Title IX controversy in NY ASA/NYSSOBLUE Volleyball 8 Sun Nov 11, 2007 05:34pm
Controversy at WBC - USA vs Japan gsf23 Baseball 47 Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:20pm
Controversy...All-star Weekend! Dribble Basketball 9 Tue Feb 21, 2006 06:22pm
Controversy at end of game..... that's a walk Basketball 29 Tue Feb 01, 2005 08:48am
three point controversy refjef40 Basketball 14 Thu Feb 01, 2001 06:01pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37pm.

The Official Forum - Archive - Top


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1