|
|||
Assignor Politics
Hey Fellas,
Don't post much,but I'm always lurking. Just curious as to how everyone is dealing with the politics within their individual organizations with respect to assignments to H.S. playoff games? Any stories? Do coaches' ratings mean anything when it comes time for the playoff assignments? J |
|
|||
Quote:
We also have an all-in format where every team plays. Round 1 has almost as many games (some byes do exist) as a regular season game. There were 161 crews apply for the tournament and 156 first round games so almost everyone works at least 1 round. |
|
|||
Well, in our association the assignor made a recommendation committee. They put together the crews. To no ones surprise the head of that committee is on the numer one crew. I am not sure how other states are but we have a ranking system. A rank 3 is NOT to suppose to work playoffs, yet we have a rank 3 on the first crew. Oh, and take a guess at who is his good friend. YEP, the head of the committee. Go figure! No politics here in the sunshine state.
|
|
|||
In our association, the other officials on the crew evaluate each other after each game. These ratings are then compiled into a database, and the top officials at the end of the season at each position are our playoff officials.
The previous association which I worked in ranked officials based upon varsity experience. After 5 years of varsity experience you went to the bottom of the playoff list for your position. Each time somebody was tapped for a playoff spot at that position, they moved to the bottom of the list. On average, it took about 3 or 4 years to work up to a playoff. And you couldn't do a 2nd round until you did a 1st round, a semi until you did a quarter, and a final until you did a semi. Thus to be eligible for a state final, it could take many years. I did my first quarter 2 years ago after 9 years. Now, the former is susceptible to politics. But at least not from the assignor. Fellow officials can agree to rank each other highly after every game, thus securing high enough ratings to qualify for a playoff spot. However, since we rotate each week with a different crew, this is less likely. However, the assignor does pair members, and if the assignor is part of the good old boy club, it could be a problem. The latter is less susceptible to politics. But it makes it possible for unqualified, or less qualified, officials to make it to a quarter, semi, or even final. If the goal is to provide quality officials for state assignments, this is a problem. However, it takes politics out of the equation. Being part of two systems, I can see the flaws in both. I'd like to hear more about other systems. No system is perfect, but perhaps some are better than others. |
|
|||
In Texas, most coaches get together and select specific crews or at least chapters for their games. When our chapter gets an unspecified crew assignment, the secretary along with the President and VP choose the crew that will work.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
In general, just about everybody on a crew will get a playoff game. The assignment sec comes up with his schedule which is approved by the committee (who I think really only consider the semi & final crews). The openers and quarters are usually done by the "season" crews. Semi's & finals are put together crews and we switch to 7 man. There are qualifiers for each level regarding experience (years on a crew), ratings (each certified official rates all officials they work with thru the season), and prior playoff experience (for example, you have to work a semi before you get a final). You cannot work a final 2 years in a row.
Our rookie assignment sec this year has done a good job all season (hat tip to Ref in SoCA) so I see no reason to expect any problems during the playoffs either. Hey Tom, don't screw it up, 'k? And if he does, well I'm sure I'll get to hear about it since I'm the Mediation Comm Chair. Last edited by Mike L; Fri Oct 26, 2007 at 03:22pm. |
|
|||
In Nebraska, the state association assigns the officials for the playoffs, using crew applications, and feedback from the coaches. However, the Metro Officials Association (based in Omaha), also has some input, especially to some of the Class A games (Omaha-sized schools) because their "varsity" officials work alot of those regular season games.
|
|
|||
Mike L, are you in CIF - Southern Section?
Here in the North Coast Section, each association is to send a list of officials to the NCS. Coaches also receive this list and have some input on who gets assigned to their games. The NCS then assigns officials from the various associations.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
I thought I'd add another note.
I'm in Washington state, and the state grants state playoff assignments to associations. Each association, according to their own rules, assigns officials to those assignments. Some associations may use coach input, some derive their own standards, such as I've already posted. I personally find it interesting that coaches are given input. Certainly some coaches may be able to fairly assess officiating ability, but I think it is far better to have officials doing the evaluating. Too often coaches are ignorant of the responsibilities of officials and the rules. |
|
|||
Ohio Playoff Assignments are Determined as Follows
1.Each individual is rated by the coaches for each game that they work. 2.The athletic directors can vote for any official, whether or not they worked at their school. 3.The assignors get a vote. 4.The associations each nominate 3 officials at each position. 5.Oh, and the state also tells us they can still choose whoever they want. This system is attack proof in that officials only know their coach rating and association nominees. The other 3 factors are not shared with the officials. Approximately 15-20% of the officials receive playoff assignments and 50% of those receive 1 game. |
|
|||
We only have two officials association in Nebraska (that I know of) and both of them are in Eastern Nebraska: the Metro Officials Association in Omaha, and the Eastern Nebraska Officials Association in Lincoln. If the state association (NSAA) did give assignments to the local associations, especially for games in the Omaha/Lincoln areas, hell would be had in the rest of the state, especially for crews that are just outside of those metro areas.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Here it is typically the case that the schools contract with the association. Usually an association covers a geographical area, such as a county, city, or even region. Also, the state gives assignments to assocations for positions, not for crews. For example, our association was given a B semi for HL and LJ, an A semi for R, a 4A semi for U, and an A final for BJ. We decided which of our officials will fill those spots. |
|
|||
Quote:
Regular season, schools are responsible for their own contracts with officials, except in the Metro and River Cities Conferences, where the Midwest Officials Association (I just realized I've been saying it wrong in the previous postings as Metro Officials Association) has an assignor that assigns the crews for those games. The home schools are still responsible for paying the officials. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WHO IS THE PRESIDENT?(politics) | flemmer | Baseball | 6 | Sun Aug 05, 2007 08:15pm |
Asa Politics | chuck chopper | Softball | 8 | Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:17am |
Politics, unions, and such | Dakota | Softball | 3 | Wed May 24, 2006 08:46am |
Association Politics | rmiszta | Softball | 5 | Mon Mar 10, 2003 04:25pm |
politics of the game. | Impar Tiality | Basketball | 7 | Wed Jun 07, 2000 03:36pm |